一种降低人-地撞击损伤的车辆制动控制方法

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2021.01.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为降低车人碰撞事故中人与地面撞击所致损伤，提出一种车辆制动控制策略。该策略在检测到人体头部与车辆首次接触后松开车辆制动，之后依据若干准则再次完全制动车辆直到车辆停止。选择10种车型、两种制动方法（完全制动和控制制动）和一个虚拟仿真系统（包含3种车速×4种行人尺寸×2种行人步态）设计了共480次MADYMO仿真试验。结果发现控制制动能降低人-地撞击所致损伤但不会加重车辆的损伤，且能将83.75%案例中车辆与人体主要部位首次触地点位置之间的距离缩短至1 m内。进一步讨论了车型和车速对制动控制策略防护效果的影响、人车首次接触与再次完全制动车辆的时间间隔取值规律和控制制动中损伤加重案例的原因等问题，为今后开发更实用且高效的制动控制策略提供技术支持。

关键词: 人地撞击, 损伤, 制动

Abstract:

In order to reduce the pedestrian?ground impact injury in vehicle pedestrian collisions， a vehicle braking control strategy is proposed. The strategy releases the vehicle brake after the first contact between pedestrian head and vehicle， and then completely brakes the vehicle again according to some rules until the vehicle stops. Ten vehicle models， two braking methods （full braking and control braking） and a virtual test system （including 3 speeds ×4 pedestrian sizes ×2 pedestrian gaits） are selected to conduct all?together 480 simulation tests with MADYMO.The results show that the control braking method can reduce the pedestrian?ground impact injury without aggravating vehicle damage， and can shorten the distance between the vehicle and the first landing point of human body to within 1 m in 83.75% cases. Furthermore， the influence of vehicle type and impact speed on the protective effect of control braking method， the law of time?interval between first pedestrian?vehicle contact and re?full braking of vehicle and the reasons of injury aggravation in controlling braking are discussed， providing technical support for the further development of more practical and efficient braking control strategy in the future.

Key words: pedestrian?ground impact, injury, braking

邹铁方,刘朱紫,肖璟,刘期. 一种降低人-地撞击损伤的车辆制动控制方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(1): 105-112.

Tiefang Zou,Zhuzi Liu,Jing Xiao,Qi Liu. A Vehicle Braking Control Method for Reducing Pedestrian⁃Ground Impact Injury[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 105-112.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 26

1	OTTE D， POHLEMANN T. Analysis and load assessment of secondary impact to adult pedestrians after car collisions on roads ［C］. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury （IRCOBI） Conference， Isle of Man， UK， 2001.
2	KENDALL R， MEISSNER M， CRANDALL J. The causes of head injury in vehicle-pedestrian impacts： comparing the relative danger of vehicle and road surface ［C］. SAE Paper 2006-01-0462.
3	BADEA-ROMERO A， LENARD J. Source of head injury for pedestrians and pedal cyclists： striking vehicle or road？［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2013， 50： 1140-1150.
4	邹铁方，肖璟，胡林，等. 轿车-行人事故中人体损伤来源与相关性分析［J］. 汽车工程， 2017， 39（7）： 748-753，747.
	ZOU Tiefang， XIAO Jing， HU Lin， et al. Human-body injury sources and correlation analysis on car-pedestrian accidents ［J］. Automotive Engineering， 2017， 39（7）： 748-753，747.
5	TAMURA A， DUMA S. A study on the potential risk of traumatic brain injury due to ground impact in a vehicle-pedestrian collision using full-scale finite element models ［J］. Int. J. Vehicle Safety， 2011， 5 （2）： 117-136.
6	SHANG S， OTTE D， LI G， et al. Detailed assessment of pedestrian ground contact injuries observed from in-depth accident data ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2018， 110： 9-17.
7	SIMMS C K， ORMOND T， WOOD D P. The influence of vehicle shape on pedestrian ground contact mechanisms ［C］. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference. Poland， 2011， 11：282-286.
8	SIMMS C K， WOOD D P. Effects of pre-impact pedestrian position and motion on kinematics and injuries from vehicle and ground contact ［J］. International Journal of Crashworthiness， 2006， 11（4）：345-355.
9	HAMACHER M， ECKSTEIN L， PAAS R. Vehicle related influence of post-car impact pedestrian kinematics on secondary impact ［C］. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference， 2012：717-729.
10	TAMURA A， KOIDE T， YANG K H. Effects of ground impact on traumatic brain injury in a fender vault pedestrian crash ［J］. International Journal of Vehicle Safety， 2014， 8 （1）： 85-85.
11	CROCETTA G， PIANTINI S， PIERINI M， et al. The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2015， 79：56-69.
12	YIN S， LI J， XU J. Exploring the mechanisms of vehicle front-end shape on pedestrian head injuries caused by ground impact ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2017， 106：285-296.
13	SHI L， Han Y， Huang H， et al. Analysis of pedestrian-to-ground impact injury risk in vehicle-to-pedestrian collisions based on rotation angles ［J］. Journal of Safety Research， 2018， 64： 37-47.
14	HAN Y， LI Q， WANG F， et al. Analysis of pedestrian kinematics and ground impact in traffic accidents using video records ［J］. International Journal of Crashworthiness， 2019，24（2）：211-220.
15	KHAYKIN A， LARNER D L. Adhesive vehicle front end for mitigation of secondary pedestrian impact：US9340178B1［P］. United States Patent， 2016-05-17.
16	ZOU T， SHANG S， SIMMS C. Potential benefits of controlled vehicle baking to reduce pedestrian ground contact injuries ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2019， 129： 94-107.
17	Dr Steffan Datentechnik. PC-CRASH， a simulation program for vehicle accidents， operation and technical manual ［M］. Version 10.0. North America： Macinnis Engineering Associates， 2013.
18	ZOU T， YU Z， CAI M， et al. Analysis and application of relationship between post-braking-distance and throw distance in vehicle-pedestrian accident reconstruction ［J］. Forensic Science International， 2011， 207（1）： 135-144.
19	LI G， YANG J， SIMMS C. A virtual test system representing the distribution of pedestrian impact configurations for future vehicle front-end optimization ［J］. Traffic Injury Prevention， 2016， 17（5）：515-523.
20	SIMMS C， WOOD D. Pedestrian and cyclist impact ［M］. Berlin： Springer Netherlands， Solid Mechanics and Its Application， 2009-8-5，248.
21	冯成建，王富平，徐臣，等. 基于车人碰撞事故重建的行人头部动力学响应［J］. 医用生物力学， 2013， 28（2）： 164-170.
	FENG Chengjian， WANG Fuping， XU Chen， et al. Head dynamic response based on reconstruction of vehicle-pedestrian accidents with the video ［J］. Journal of Medical Biomechanics， 2013， 28（2）： 164-170.
22	LI G， YANG J， SIMMS C. Safer passenger car front shapes for pedestrians： a computational approach to reduce overall pedestrian injury risk in realistic impact scenarios ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2017， 100：97-110.
23	GUILLAUME A， HERMITTE T， HERVE V， et al. Car or ground： which causes more pedestrian injuries？［C］. Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles （ESV）. Washington DC： NHTSA， 2015.
24	EUBANKS J J， HILL P F，CATEEL D A. Pedestrian accident reconstruction and litigation ［M］. 3rd ed. Tucson Arizona USA： Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company， 2018.
25	李华，李岳林，邹铁方，等. 车人碰撞事故中车头参数敏感性分析［J］. 汽车安全与节能学报， 2017， 8（4）： 367-373.
	LI HUA， LI Yuelin， ZOU Tiefang， et al. Parameter sensitivity analysis of vehicle head shape for vehicle-pedestrian accidents ［J］. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy， 2017， 8（4）： 367-373.
26	SIMMS C， WOOD D. Pedestrian risk from cars and sport utility vehicles-a comparative analytical study ［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D： Journal of Automobile Engineering， 2006， 220 （8）：1085-1100.

[1]	王彦鑫,李海岩,崔世海,贺丽娟,吕文乐. 基于BP神经网络的儿童乘员头部损伤预测模型及评估参数研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(2): 329-336.
[2]	焦志鹏, 马建, 赵轩, 张凯, 孟德安, 韩琪, 张昭. 基于电动汽车制动安全检测的短时工况及方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 109-119.
[3]	白先旭,左瑜,李维汉,石琴,李楚照,赵树廉,陈炯. 自动紧急制动系统控制模块的SOTIF量化评价[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(9): 1655-1665.
[4]	傅耀宇, 周二振, 丁瑞阳, 周云波, 付条奇, 张明. 某车辆滚翻过程中乘员颈部动态响应[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(7): 1276-1285.
[5]	邹铁方,刘前程,魏亮. 加装传统AEB后的未避免事故典型碰撞场景与事故特征[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(6): 1062-1072.
[6]	张宗阳,谢双双,王凯,张玉鹏,邴涛,孙士涛. 基于复杂边界的牵引车车架疲劳研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(5): 873-879.
[7]	邹铁方,周靖. 参数扰动下基于制动控制的人地碰撞损伤防护风险[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(2): 313-323.
[8]	熊璐,李聪聪,卓桂荣,程玉林,乔乐,王心坚. 电子机械制动器构型及控制技术发展现状[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(12): 2187-2199.
[9]	张荣荣,孙思睿,樊杰,刘苏俊,杨勤超,张风利. 碳陶盘式制动器散热特性台架实验分析与数值仿真研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2165-2174.
[10]	李海岩,胡静,贺丽娟,冉令华,吕文乐,崔世海,阮世捷. 中国体征第五百分位女性汽车乘员损伤仿生模型开发及验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(10): 1965-1974.
[11]	孙振东,朱海涛,彭伟强,杨佳璘. 汽车预碰撞制动下乘员离位影响及参数优化分析[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(1): 112-118.
[12]	刘永涛,刘传攀,刘湘安,陈轶嵩,乔洁. 基于自适应采样时间MPC的自动紧急制动系统[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(1): 32-41.
[13]	刘兆勇,龙一鸣,厉逸航,谭小强,吴光强. 集成式电液制动系统设计及参数匹配的研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(9): 1416-1424.
[14]	曾小华,钱琦峰,宋大凤,高皓铭,吴佳俊. 紧急制动工况下的纵向车速估计方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(9): 1425-1436.
[15]	谈东奎,胡港君,朱波,金来,张捷. 考虑预期功能安全的智能汽车自动紧急制动系统[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(6): 799-808.