全球NCAP行人保护测评的对比研究及展望

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2021.05.012

Abstract

Abstract:

New car assessment program （NCAP）， as an evaluation mechanism the automotive enterprises and massive consumers highly concern， plays an important role in promoting the research and development of vehicle safety technology. In recent years， a variety of NCAPs in the world constantly make progress in pedestrian protection， and the newly promulgated C?NCAP （2021） proposes a higher requirement on pedestrian protection. In this paper， the way of testing and scoring criteria provisioned in the latest versions of NCAP in China， Europe， Australia， South Korea， Japan， and Latin America are reviewed and comparatively analyzed， with the prospects of evaluation method of pedestrian protection forecast， aiming at providing a comprehensive reference to the research， development and evaluation personnel in automotive enterprises and an important basis for the formulation of the safety standard for vehicle?pedestrian crash in China.

Key words: global NCAP, pedestrian protection, testing and assessment methods, comparative study

Haiyan Li,Zhen Yang,Lijuan He,Lü Wenle,Shihai Cui,Shijie Ruan. Comparative Study and Prospect of Pedestrian Protection Assessment in Global NCAP[J].Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(5): 730-738.

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

1	World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018： supporting a decade of action ［R］. Switzerland： World Health Organization， 2018.
2	World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2015： supporting a decade of action ［R］. Switzerland： World Health Organization， 2015.
3	刘玉光，刘志新. 各国新车评价规程（NCAP）测试评价技术的现状与发展［J］. 汽车安全与节能学报， 2013， 4（1）：16-22.
	LIU Y G， LIU Z X. Status and development tendency of the test and assessment technique of the NCAP in different countries［J］. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy， 2013， 4（1）：16-22.
4	黄俊. 面向行人下肢碰撞保护的汽车前端结构快速优化设计研究［D］. 北京：清华大学， 2013.
	HUANG J. Study of the vehicle front⁃end structure fast design for pedestrian legform protection［D］. Beijing： Tsinghua University， 2013.
5	KIM Dongseok. Trend of regulation and ncap for pedestrian protection［J］. Auto Journal： Journal of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers， 2014.
6	PAINE M， PAINE D， BERG A V D， et al. Trends in pedestrian protection for vehicles rated by australasian NCAP［C］. 26th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles （ESV）， 2019.
7	乔维高，王宇航. 汽车与行人碰撞中行人保护的研究现状及发展趋势［J］. 北京汽车， 2008 （4）： 22-24， 28.
	QIAO W G， WANG Y H. Research status and development trend of pedestrian protection in vehicle⁃pedestrian collision［J］. Beijing Automotive Engineering， 2008 （4）：22-24， 28.
8	崔洋洋，王译. 车辆行人保护技术概述［J］. 科技资讯， 2017， 15（21）： 214-215.
	CUI Y Y， WANG Y. Overview of vehicle pedestrian protection technology ［J］. Science & Technology Information， 2017， 15（21）： 214-215.
9	孙小光，张二鹏，陈现岭，等. 行人安全评估发展趋势及应对策略探讨［J］. 北京汽车， 2018 （6）：31-34.
	SUN X G， ZHANG E P， CHEN X L，et al. Discussion on the development trend and countermeasures of pedestrian safety assessment［J］. Beijing Automotive Engineering， 2018 （6）： 31-34.
10	汽车对行人的碰撞保护：GB∕T 24550—2009 ［S］.中国国家标准化管理委员会，2009.
	Collision protection of vehicles against pedestrians：［S］. Standardization Administration of China， 2009.
11	C⁃NCAP管理中心.C⁃NCAP管理规则（2021版）［S］.天津：中国汽车技术研究中心， 2020.
	C⁃NCAP Management Center. C⁃NCAP management regulation （2021 edition）［S］. Tianjin： China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.， 2020.
12	European new car assessment program pedestrian testing protocol. （2018）.Version 8.5［S/OL］. Euro NCAP， 2018.
13	ANCAP test protocol.pedestrian protection v8.5.［S/OL］. ANCAP， 2019.
14	자동차안전도평가시험등에관한규정［국토교통부고시제2016-1053호］. ［S/OL］. KNCAP， 2016.
15	Latin American & caribbean new car assessment programme （Latin NCAP） testing protocols.Version 1.0.0. ［S/OL］. Latin NCAP， 2020.
16	J NCAP歩行者頭部保護性能試験方法［S/OL］.2018.
17	ISSHIKI T， KONOSU A， TAKAHASHI Y. Development and evaluation of the advanced pedestrian legform impactor prototype which can be applicable to all types of vehicles regardless of bumper height［R］. Malaga， Spain： IRCOBI Conference， 2016.
18	European new car assessment program pedestrian assessment protocol. （2018）. Version10.0.3. ［S/OL］. Euro NCAP， 2020.
19	ANCAP assessment protocol. pedestrian protection v9.0.3. ［S/OL］. ANCAP， 2019.
20	Latin NCAP pedestrian protection2020assessment protocol v1.1.0.［S/OL］. Latin NCAP， 2020.
21	J NCAP歩行者脚部保護性能試験方法［S/OL］. J NCAP， 2018.
22	王占强，杨絮. 中国首次行人保护碰撞试验［J］. 世界汽车， 2009（10）.
	WANG Z Q， YANG X. China's first pedestrian protection collision test ［J］. World Auto， 2009（10）.
23	ZHAO W， RUAN S， LI H ， et al. Development and validation of a 5th percentile human head finite element model based on the Chinese population［J］. International Journal of Vehicle Safety， 2012， 6（2）：91-109.
24	吕文乐. 基于有限元模型的6岁儿童乘员胸部侧碰响应分析［D］. 天津：天津科技大学， 2012.
	LÜ W L. Analysis of thorax impact responses of six⁃year⁃old child occupants based on FEM［D］. Tianjin ： Tianjin University of Science & Technology， 2012.
25	European new car assessment program pedestrian human model certification （2018）.Version 1.1［S/OL］. Euro NCAP， 2018.
26	LI H， LI K， HUANG Y， et al. Validation of a finite element model with six⁃year⁃old child anatomical characteristics as specified in Euro NCAP Pedestrian Human Model Certification （TB024）［J］. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering， 2020（6）：1-15.
27	SEARSON D J ， ANDERSON R W G ， HUTCHINSON T P. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention， 2014， 63 （2）：1-8.

国家	收入水平	车辆安全标准	每10万人死亡人数	交通事故中行人死亡比例	交通事故死亡总人数趋势
澳大利亚	高	有	5.6	14%	持续下降
英国	高	有	3.1	24%	持续下降
韩国	高	有	9.8	40%	持续下降
日本	高	有	4.1	35%	持续下降
美国	高	部分	12.4	15%	持续下降
中国	中	有	18.2	26%（2015）^[2]	持续下降
印度	中	部分	22.6	10%	缓慢上升
泰国	中	仅有少数	32.4	8%	较为稳定
巴西	中	仅有少数	19.7	18%	较为稳定
哥伦比亚	中	无	18.5	26%	缓慢上升
科特迪瓦	中	无	23.6	40%	持续上升
马达加斯加	低	无	28.6	47%	持续上升

NCAP	包绕长度测量/mm	发动机罩前部基准线	发动机罩侧面基准线	发动机罩后面基准线	前风窗玻璃后基准线
C?NCAP （2021版）^[11]	1 000 1 500 1 700 2 100 2 300	1 000 mm的直尺倾斜50°底端距地面600 mm与发动机罩前表面的接触点的几何轨迹	长700 mm的直尺倾斜45°与车辆侧面相接触点的几何轨迹	直径为165 ㎜的球与前风窗玻璃保持接触与车辆前部结构的最后接触点	无
Euro NCAP^[12]	1 000 1 500 1 700 2 100
ANCAP^[13]
KNCAP^[14]
Latin NCAP^[15]
JNCAP^[16]					长700 mm的直尺倾斜75°与车顶或风窗玻璃相接触

NCAP			C?NCAP (2021版)		Euro NCAP^[18]		ANCAP^[19]	Latin NCAP^[20]	KNCAP	JNCAP^[21]
头型试验	得分		10		24		24	24	24	32
	评分标准
				HIC₁₅
				大小		得分
				HIC₁₅<650		1.0
				650≤HIC₁₅<1 000		0.75
				1 000≤HIC₁₅<1 350		0.50
				1 350≤HIC₁₅<1 700		0.25
				1 700≤HIC₁₅		0.0

腿型试验	得分		5		12		12	12	12	5
	腿型试验		aPLI 腿型试验		上腿型试验和下腿型FLEX-PLI试验					下腿型 FLEX?PLI 试验
	评分标准	高限	大腿弯矩 390 N·m 小腿弯矩 275 N·m MCL伸长量 27 mm		上腿型评分标准：弯矩 285 N·m合力 5.0 kN（Euro NCAP、ANCAP、Latin?NCAP）弯矩 300 N·m合力 5.0 kN（KNCAP）下腿型评分标准：弯矩 282 N·m；MCL伸长量19 mm；ACL/PCL伸长量10 mm					弯矩: 202 N·m MCL伸长量: 14.8 mm
	评分标准	低限	大腿弯矩 440 N·m 小腿弯矩 320 N·m MCL伸长量 32 mm		上腿型评分标准: 弯矩 350·Nm合力6.0 kN（Euro NCAP、ANCAP、Latin?NCAP）弯矩 510·Nm合力7.0 kN（KNCAP）下腿型评分标准：弯矩340 N·m；MCL伸长量22 mm； ACL/PCL伸长量10 mm					弯矩: 306 N·m MCL伸长量: 19.8 mm
总分			15		36		36	36	36	37

[1]	Haiyan Li,Kun Li,Yongqiang Huang,Lijuan He,Shihai Cui,Lü Wenle,Shijie Ruan. Research on Assessment Method of Lower Extremity Injury of Child Pedestrian Under Typical Conditions Specified in Euro NCAP TB024 [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(6): 893-899.
[2]	Hongmin Zha,Lü Xiaozhou. Study on the Launch Device of the Vehicle for Pedestrian Protection Test System [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 233-238.
[3]	Yongqiang Wu,Aifa Lou Lei Zhang. Comparative Study on the Injury of Different Percentile Dummies in Vehicle Oblique Crash [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 1216-1222.
[4]	Hu Shuaishuai, Lü Xiaojiang, Zhang Xiaotian, Zhang Haiyang, Hong Dan, Zhou Dayong. Design and Verification of Pedestrian Protection Airbag [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 608-614.
[5]	Hou Song, Luo Kun, Xie Bin, Wu Changpeng. Study on the Enhancement of the Crash Performance of aPLI Legform in a Vehicle Model [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 1558-1565.

Comparative Study and Prospect of Pedestrian Protection Assessment in Global NCAP

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10