BFRP/AA5052胶粘接头力学性能及工艺参数影响研究

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2025.02.016

Abstract

Abstract:

In this article， the effect of adhesive type， substrate properties， and structural dimensions on the mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced polymer （BFRP）-aluminum alloy （AA5052） and BFRP-BFRP single lap adhesive joints is investigated. Using the response surface methodology （RSM）， a predictive model is established to evaluate the impact of three process parameters （aluminum substrate thickness， overlap length， and the angle between the loading direction and the primary direction of the basalt fibers） on the mechanical performance of the joints. The results indicate that the strength and stiffness of the adhesive joints are influenced by the yield strength and stiffness of the bonded substrates. BFRP-BFRP adhesive joints exhibit higher peak load， whereas BFRP-AA5052 adhesive joints demonstrate greater overall stiffness. The use of brittle structural adhesives can significantly enhance the strength and fracture energy absorption of the adhesive joints， reaching up to 57.4% and 1 128.5%， respectively. The shear strength Y is introduced as an evaluation metric for assessing the adhesive strength utilization rate. A strength prediction model for Y is established based on RSM， resulting in a regression equation with good significance， and the optimal range for the process parameters is predicted. The analysis of the coupling effect of the process parameters based on the strength prediction model reveals a negative correlation between fiber direction and joint strength， while overlap length and aluminum substrate thickness show a positive correlation with joint strength. Considering the joint strength， adhesive cost， and lightweight effect， it is recommended that the loading direction aligns with the primary direction of the fibers， with the overlap length controlled within the range of 20 mm to 25 mm， and the aluminum substrate thickness within the range of 2 mm to 2.5 mm. This study provides theoretical and data support for the application of BFRP-AA5052 adhesive structures in transportation equipment.

Key words: basalt fiber, aluminum alloy, adhesive joint, process parameters, mechanical properties, prediction model

Dayong Wang,Junjia Cui,Shaoluo Wang,Shuhao Wang,Hao Jiang,Guangyao Li. Research on the Mechanical Properties and Process Parameter Influence of BFRP/AA5052 Adhesive Joints[J].Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 356-366.

Figures/Tables 18

References 22

1	高聪，祝颖丹，刘伯芳，等. 热塑性碳纤维/尼龙6复合材料界面优化及零件快速成型工艺研究［J］. 汽车工程， 2024， 46（3）： 546-556.
	GAO Cong， ZHU Yingdan， LIU Bofang， et al. Interfacial optimization and rapid prototyping process of thermoplastic Carbon Fiber/Nylon 6 composites for automotive lightweight ［J］. Automotive Engineering， 2024， 46（3）： 546-556.
2	WANG S L， ZHONG J B， GU Y Q， et al. Mechanical properties， flame retardancy， and thermal stability of basalt fiber reinforced polypropylene composites ［J］. Polymer Composites， 2020， 41（10）： 4181-4191.
3	王登峰，卢春达，梁鸿宇. 多角度冲击工况下铝/CFRP复合管诱导槽多目标优化设计［J］. 汽车工程， 2023， 45（7）： 1286-1297.
	WANG Dengfeng， LU Chunda， LIANG Hongyu. Multi-objective optimization design of induction groove for aluminum/CFRP hybrid tube under multi-angle compression condition ［J］. Automotive Engineering， 2023， 45（7）： 1286-1297.
4	DJERRAD A， FAN F， ZHI X D， et al. Experimental and numerical studies on AFRP-reinforced thin-walled tubes under axial impact loading ［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2024， 190： 104974.
5	WOLTER N， BEBER V C， BREDE M， et al. Adhesively- and hybrid- bonded joining of basalt and carbon fibre reinforced polybenzoxazine-based composites ［J］. Composite Structures， 2020， 236： 111800.
6	WANG S L， YAO Y H， TANG C H， et al. Mechanical characteristics， constitutive models and fracture behaviors of short basalt fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites under varying strain rates ［J］. Composites Part B： Engineering， 2021， 218： 108933.
7	ULUS H. An experimental assessment of hybrid bolted/bonded basalt fiber reinforced polymer composite joints' temperature-dependent mechanical performances by static and dynamic mechanical analyses ［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2022， 114： 103120.
8	YAO Y H， WANG S L， JIANG H， et al. Corrosion behavior and performance degradation of aluminum-copper cable joints with magnetic pulse crimping in salt spray environment ［J］. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China， 2024： 1-35. https：//link.cnki.net/urlid/43.1239.tg.20240606.1553.024.
9	王书豪. 玄武岩纤维增强复合材料胶粘接头力学性能及失效机制研究［D］. 长沙：湖南大学， 2022.
	WANG Shuhao. Research on mechanical properties and failure mechanism of basalt fiber reinforced composite adhesive joint ［D］．Changsha： Hunan University， 2022.
10	FIORE V， DI FRANCO F， MIRANDA R， et al. Effects of anodizing surface treatment on the mechanical strength of aluminum alloy 5083 to fibre reinforced composites adhesive joints ［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2021， 108： 102868.
11	PEREIRA A M， FERREIRA J M， ANTUNES F V， et al. Analysis of manufacturing parameters on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints ［J］. Journal of Materials Processing Technology， 2010， 210（4）： 610-617.
12	SUN G Y， LIU X L， ZHENG G， et al. On fracture characteristics of adhesive joints with dissimilar materials-an experimental study using digital image correlation （DIC） technique ［J］. Composite Structures， 2018， 201： 1056-1075.
13	HASHEMINIA S M， PARK B C， CHUN H J， et al. Failure mechanism of bonded joints with similar and dissimilar material ［J］. Composites Part B： Engineering， 2019， 161： 702-709.
14	WANG S L， LIANG W， DUAN L M， et al. Effects of loading rates on mechanical property and failure behavior of single-lap adhesive joints with carbon fiber reinforced plastics and aluminum alloys ［J］. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2020， 106： 2569-2581.
15	HU P， HAN X， DA SILVA L F M， et al. Strength prediction of adhesively bonded joints under cyclic thermal loading using a cohesive zone model ［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2013， 41： 6-15.
16	FIORE V， ALAGNA F， DI BELLA G， et al. On the mechanical behavior of BFRP to aluminum AA6086 mixed joints ［J］. Composites Part B： Engineering， 2013， 48： 79-87.
17	崔岸，杨伟丽，程普，等. 玄武岩纤维/铝合金层合板低速冲击性能及应用研究［J］. 汽车工程， 2020， 42（5）： 694-699，708.
	CUI An， YANG Weili， CHENG Pu， et al. Study on low-speed impact performance and application of basalt fiber/aluminum alloy laminates ［J］. Automotive Engineering， 2020， 42（5）： 694-699，708.
18	那景新，高原，慕文龙，等. 高温老化对玄武岩纤维增强树脂复合材料-铝合金单搭接接头失效的影响［J］. 复合材料学报， 2020， 37（1）： 140-146.
	NA Jingxin， GAO Yuan， MU Wenlong， et al. Effect of high temperature exposure on adhesively bonded basalt fiber reinforced polymer compositealuminum alloy single lap joints ［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica， 2020， 37（1）： 140-146.
19	栾建泽，那景新，慕文龙，等. 低速加载对铝合金-玄武岩纤维增强树脂复合材料粘接接头失效的影响［J］. 上海交通大学学报， 2020， 54（11）： 1200-1208.
	LUAN Jianze， NA Jingxin， MU Wenlong， et al. Effect of low speed loading on failure of aluminum alloy-basalt fiber reinforced polymer compositebonded joint ［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University， 2020， 54（11）： 1200-1208.
20	栾建泽，那景新，谭伟，等. 服役低温老化对铝合金-玄武岩纤维增强树脂复合材料粘接接头力学性能的影响及失效预测［J］. 复合材料学报， 2020， 37（8）： 1884-1893.
	LUAN Jianze， NA Jingxin， TAN Wei， et al. Effect of service low-temperature aging on mechanical properties of aluminum alloy-basalt fiber reinforced polymer composite bonding joints and failure prediction ［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica， 2020， 37（8）： 1884-1893.
21	张继成. 温湿老化对BFRP-铝合金胶接结构失效的影响研究［D］. 长春：吉林大学， 2023.
	ZHANG Jicheng. Effects of Temperature and humidity aging on the failure of BFRP-aluminum alloy bonded structure ［D］. Changchun： Jilin University， 2023.
22	WANG S L， WANG S H， LI G Y， et al. Dynamic response and fracture analysis of basalt fiber reinforced plastics and aluminum alloys adhesive joints ［J］. Composite Structures， 2021， 268： 114013.

AA5052		Araldite 2015/回天7130
参数	数值	参数	数值
弹性模量/GPa	70.3	密度/（kg·m^-3）	1 200/1 400
屈服强度/MPa	167.2	固化温度/℃	25/180
拉伸强度/MPa	223.5	固化时间	24 h/30 min
泊松比	0.31	t_g/℃	67/＞100

分组	试件编号	基板1材料	基板2材料	胶粘剂
A	BAH	BFRP	AA5052	回天-7130
A	BAA	BFRP	AA5052	Araldite 2015
B	BBH	BFRP	BFRP	回天-7130
B	BBA	BFRP	BFRP	Araldite 2015

项	平方和	自由度	均方差	F	P
模型	107.65	9	11.96	30.46	0.000 8
A	9.81	1	9.81	24.99	0.004 1
B	18.06	1	10.08	45.99	0.001 1
C	60.72	1	60.72	154.62	＜0.000 1
AB	0.220 9	1	0.220 9	0.562 5	0.048 7
AC	6.71	1	6.71	17.08	0.009 1
BC	0.828 1	1	0.828 1	2.11	0.206 2
A²	1.52	1	1.52	3.88	0.105 9
B²	10.02	1	10.02	25.52	0.003 9
C²	0.723	1	0.723	1.84	0.232 9
残差	1.96	5	0.392 7
失拟项	1.79	3	0.596 4
绝对误差	0.174 2	2	0.087 1
总离差	109.61	14

[1]	Hengfeng Yin,Dang Lu,Haitao Min,Haidong Wu,Yandong Zhang. Study on the Influence of Inclination Angle on the Mechanical Characteristics of Tire Turn-Slip [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 342-355.
[2]	Ying Zhao,Jibo Hao,Keming Zhou,Jianfeng Hu,Yicheng Wang,Yueqiang Wang. Mechanical Properties of Double-arrow Non-pneumatic Tires Under the Condition of Unstructured Road [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 149-160.
[3]	Lijun Qian,Luxin Yu,Xianguang Gu,Wenyu Liang. Crushing Analysis and Interval Optimization Design for Multi Cell Aluminum Alloy Thin-Walled Tubes [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(7): 1323-1334.
[4]	Bo Liu,Yongxin Tang,Yi Wu,Ziyang Wang,Qin Yang,Tiegang Hu,Xiaomin Xu. Study on Lightweight Design of Integrated Mega-casting Aluminum Alloy Vehicle Body Components [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(12): 2154-2163.
[5]	Mingjun Zhang,Xiong Li,Heqing Li,Chenxi Li,Jian Zhang,Bo Cheng,Kaiming Wang,Cong Mao,Yongle Hu. Influence of Nanosecond Pulsed Laser Cleaning on Laser Welding Quality of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(11): 1786-1796.
[6]	Dang Lu,Wenhao Yang,Haidong Wu,Nanshi Chen,Jian Cheng,Zhenwei Zhang. Research on High-Accuracy Finite Element Modeling Method for Tire Mechanics Characteristics Simulation [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(10): 1556-1562.
[7]	Liangsong Chen,Jun Song,Yi Qiu,Zunming Wang. Subjective⁃Objective Test and Correlation Analysis of Automobile Seat Vibration Comfort [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 1263-1269.
[8]	Cui An, Yang Weili, Cheng Pu, Jin Weiguang, Xü Xiaoqian, Liu Tianci, Huang Xianqing. Study on Low-speed Impact Performance and Application of Basalt Fiber/Aluminum Alloy Laminates [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 694-699.
[9]	Lin Jiawu, Li Xuanshuang, Chen Zongming, Chen Dong, Li Yongxiang, Geng Furong. Lightweight Design of Body Rear Longitudinal Beam of VAHP Die-casting Aluminum Alloy [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(3): 383-389.
[10]	Wang Zhenhu, Xia Erli, Zhang Songbo, Qiu Sawei , Li Luoxing. A Research on the Correlations Among Basic Performances of Aluminum-alloy Body Platform [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(7): 823-830.
[11]	Zhao Yang, Li Mingdi, Wang Zhihao, Xu Guangju, Yuan Yinnan, Wu Bin. Effect of EGR Exhaust Gas Composition and Temperature onMechanical Characteristics of Diesel Engine Particles [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(6): 634-640.
[12]	Qin Guofeng, Na Jingxin, Mu Wenlong, Tan Wei, Liu Haolei. Comparative Study on the Failure of Adhesively Bonded GFRP/AluminumAlloy and Aluminum Alloy/Aluminum Alloy Joints [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 599-606.
[13]	Zhou Xiaolong, Liu Weina, Jiang Zhenhai, Ma Fenglei. Application of Volterra Mode of Variational Mode Decomposition and Morphology Fractal Dimension in Engine Fault Diagnosis [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 1442-1449.
[14]	Wang Zheyang, Wang Zhenhu, Zhang Songbo, Li Luoxing. Application of CVDA Sequential Sampling Method to Lightweight Design of Aluminum Alloy Frame [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 1466-1472.
[15]	Chengpeng, Jin Feixiang, Shao Chenxi, Xiu Lei. Optimization of Die Face for Aluminum Alloy ClosurePanel Based on Orthogonal Experiment [J]. , 2019, 41(1): 96-102.

Research on the Mechanical Properties and Process Parameter Influence of BFRP/AA5052 Adhesive Joints

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 22

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

试验序号	因素A	因素B	因素C	响应值Y
1	2.0	15	0	14.53
2	2.0	35	0	12.78
3	2.0	15	45	10.21
4	2.0	35	45	6.64
5	2.5	15	22.5	13.44
6	2.5	35	22.5	9.62
7	2.5	25	0	17.76
8	2.5	25	45	9.38
9	1.5	15	22.5	11.59
10	1.5	35	22.5	8.71
11	1.5	25	0	12.12
12	1.5	25	45	8.92
13	2.0	25	22.5	12.94
14	2.0	25	22.5	13.47
15	2.0	25	22.5	12.98