Administrator by China Associction for Science and Technology
Sponsored by China Society of Automotive Engineers
Published by AUTO FAN Magazine Co. Ltd.

Automotive Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 1936-1943.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2022.12.015

Special Issue: 底盘&动力学&整车性能专题2022年

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Vibration Comfort Evaluation of Vehicle Seat Based on Body Pressure Distribution

Kaizhan Gao,Qiao Luo,Zhifei Zhang(),Zhongming Xu   

  1. School of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400030
  • Received:2022-06-28 Revised:2022-08-09 Online:2022-12-25 Published:2022-12-22
  • Contact: Zhifei Zhang E-mail:z.zhang@cqu.edu.cn

Abstract:

For using the body pressure distribution on the human-seat contact surface to characterize the vibration comfort of vehicle seat, the subjective and objective test of seat vibration comfort are conducted with 12 test participants under low-frequency vertical excitation with six different magnitudes to find the body pressure distribution indicator. The test results of vibration acceleration and body pressure distribution are analyzed to extract the objective evaluation indicators, including the root-mean-square (RMS) of weighted acceleration, the means of average pressure and maximum pressure, and the RMSs of average pressure changing rate and normal force changing rate. A correlation analysis is carried out on subjective and objective indicators by applying non-parametric statistics method. The results show that the means of average pressure and maximum pressure have rather weak correlation with subjective discomfort score (β=0.26, 0.10 respectively), while the RMSs of average pressure changing rate and normal force changing rate have strong correlation with subjective discomfort score (β=0.83, 0.85 respectively). Finally, the relationship between the objective parameters and subjective discomfort rating is analyzed by using Stevens’ power law. The results indicate that compare with the RMS indicator of weighted acceleration, the RMSs of both average pressure changing rate and normal force changing rate are highly correlated (R2 >99.0%) with subjective discomfort score, hence can be taken as body pressure distribution indicators to characterize vibration comfort.

Key words: vehicle seat, vibration comfort, subjective evaluation, objective test, body pressure distribution