乘员晕车的生理表征与缓解方法

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2024.01.006

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to enhance the comfort and user acceptance of intelligent connected vehicles， a cognitive process model for passenger carsickness mitigation is established in this paper and an olfactory stimulation-based mitigation strategy is proposed. Firstly， a screening experiment of olfactory stimulation materials for carsickness relief is designed and carried out， fully considering occupant satisfaction as well as the functional requirements of carsickness relief， to select the odor type and concentration of olfactory stimulation materials. Then， a carsickness mitigation experiment based on a real car is carried out to investigate the mapping relationship between different degrees of carsickness and physiological representations and further validate the efficiency of the olfactory mitigation method. The results show that the subjective carsickness degree is positively correlated with GSR activation and negatively correlated with EEG asymmetry. Moreover， releasing 20% ginger blossom odor for 10 seconds can effectively relieve carsickness symptoms， with an average relief effect of 22.17%， which is verified in terms of subjective and objective dimensions.

Key words: carsickness, relief method, olfaction stimulation, electroencephalography, galvanic skin response

Yingzhang Wu, Ying Lin, Wenbo Li, Yalan Yu, Guofa Li, Gang Guo. Physiological Manifestation and Relief Method of Passenger’s Carsickness[J].Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 50-60.

Figures/Tables 14

References 46

1	国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2020年国民经济和社会发展统计公报［J］.中国统计，2021，471（3）：8-22.
	National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical bulletin of the People's Republic of China on national economic and social development in 2020 ［J］. China Statistics， 2021， 471（3）：8-22.
2	SCHMIDT E A， KUIPER O X， WOLTER S， et al. An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness［J］. Transportation Research Part F： Traffic Psychology and Behaviour， 2020， 71： 76-87.
3	TURNER M， GRIFFIN M J. Motion sickness in public road transport： the effect of driver， route and vehicle［J］. Ergonomics， 1999， 42（12）： 1646-1664.
4	张晓聪. 汽车智能座舱发展现状及未来趋势［J］. 汽车纵横， 2019（8）：42-45.
	ZHANG X C. Development status and future trends of automotive smart cockpit ［J］. Auto Review， 2019（8）：42-45.
5	李克强，戴一凡，李升波，等. 智能网联汽车（ICV）技术的发展现状及趋势［J］. 汽车安全与节能学报， 2017， 8（1）： 1-14.
	LI K Q， DAI Y F， LI S B， et al. State-of-the-art and technical trends of intelligent and connected vehicles［J］. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy， 2017， 8（1）： 1-14.
6	ROLNICK A， LUBOW R E. Why is the driver rarely motion sick？ the role of controllability in motion sickness［J］. Ergonomics， 1991， 34（7）： 867-879.
7	高振海，金励辛，高菲，等.自动驾驶车辆晕动症研究综述［J］.汽车技术，2022（8）：1-9.
	GAO Z H， JIN L X， GAO F， et al. A research review on motion sickness in autonomous vehicles［J］. Automobile Technology， 2022（8）：1-9.
8	REASON J T. Motion sickness adaptation： a neural mismatch model［J］. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine， 1978， 71（11）： 819-829.
9	JAMES W. The sense of dizziness in deaf-mutes［J］. American Annals of the Deaf and Dumb， 1883， 28（2）： 102-117.
10	ORIEL G H. The pathology of sea-sickness［J］. Lancet， 1927： 811-813.
11	CHEUNG B S K， HOWARD I P， NEDZELSKI J M， et al. Circularvection about earth-horizontal axes in bilateral labyrinthine-defective subjects［J］. Acta Oto-Laryngologica， 1989， 108（5-6）： 336-344.
12	CHEUNG B S， HOWARD I P， MONEY K E. Visually-induced sickness in normal and bilaterally labyrinthine-defective subjects［J］. Aviation， Space， and Environmental Medicine， 1991， 62（6）： 527-531.
13	JOHNSON W H， SUNAHARA F A， LANDOLT J P. Importance of the vestibular system in visually induced nausea and self-vection［J］. Journal of Vestibular Research， 1999， 9（2）： 83-87.
14	GRAYBIEL A. Susceptibility to acute motion sickness in blind persons［M］. US Naval Aerospace Medical Institute， Naval Aerospace Medical Center， 1970.
15	SHUPAK A， GORDON C R. Motion sickness： advances in pathogenesis， prediction， prevention， and treatment［J］. Aviation， Space， and Environmental Medicine， 2006， 77（12）： 1213-1223.
16	SHERMAN C R. Motion sickness： review of causes and preventive strategies［J］. Journal of Travel Medicine， 2002， 9（5）： 251-256.
17	KESHAVARZ B， HECHT H， ZSCHUTSCHKE L. Intra-visual conflict in visually induced motion sickness［J］. Displays， 2011， 32（4）： 181-188.
18	刘茜，兰彪盛，焦亚军，等.雾化吸入不同植物精油对小鼠的抗晕动病作用［J］.实用预防医学，2019，26（1）：109-110，113.
	LIU Q， LAN B S， JIAO Y J， et al. Curative effect of atomized inhalation of different plant essential oils on mice with motion sickness ［J］. Practical Preventive Medicine， 2019，26（1）：109-110，113.
19	KENNEDY R S， TOLHURST G C， GRAYBIEL A. The effects of visual deprivation on adaptation to a rotating environment［R］. Naval School of Aviation Medicine Pensacola Fla， 1965.
20	BOS J E， DE VRIES S C， VAN EMMERIK M L， et al. The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness［J］. Applied Ergonomics， 2010， 41（4）： 516-521.
21	KESHAVARZ B， HECHT H. Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness［J］. Human Factors， 2011， 53（4）： 415-426.
22	BOS J E， MACKINNON S N， PATTERSON A. Motion sickness symptoms in a ship motion simulator： effects of inside， outside， and no view［J］. Aviation， Space， and Environmental Medicine， 2005， 76（12）： 1111-1118.
23	WERTHEIM A H， BOS J E， KRUL A J. Predicting motion induced vomiting from subjective misery （MISC） ratings obtained in 12 experimental studies［M］. TNO Human Factors， 2001.
24	NALIVAIKO E， RUDD J A， SO R H Y. Motion sickness， nausea and thermoregulation： the “toxic” hypothesis［J］. Temperature， 2014， 1（3）： 164-171.
25	NOBEL G， TRIBUKAIT A， MEKJAVIC I B， et al. Effects of motion sickness on thermoregulatory responses in a thermoneutral air environment［J］. European Journal of Applied Physiology， 2012， 112（5）： 1717-1723.
26	CHELEN W E， KABRISKY M， ROGERS S K. Spectral analysis of the electroencephalographic response to motion sickness［J］. Aviation， Space， and Environmental Medicine， 1993， 64（1）： 24-29.
27	CHUANG S W， CHUANG C H， YU Y H， et al. EEG alpha and gamma modulators mediate motion sickness-related spectral responses［J］. International Journal of Neural Systems， 2016， 26（2）： 1650007.
28	BRADLEY M M， LANG P J. Measuring emotion： the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential［J］. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry， 1994， 25（1）： 49-59.
29	GOLDING J F. Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire［J］. Personality and Individual Differences，2006，41（2）：237-248.
30	LIU Y， SOURINA O. Real-time subject-dependent EEG-based emotion recognition algorithm［M］. Transactions on Computational Science XXIII. Springer， Berlin， Heidelberg， 2014： 199-223.
31	LIU Y， SOURINA O. EEG databases for emotion recognition［C］. 2013 International Conference on Cyberworlds， 2013： 302-309.
32	DADEBAYEV D， GOH W W， TAN E X. EEG-based emotion recognition： review of commercial EEG devices and machine learning techniques［J］. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences， 2021.
33	LAN Z， SOURINA O， WANG L， et al. Stability of features in real-time EEG-based emotion recognition algorithm［C］. 2014 International Conference on Cyberworlds， 2014： 137-144.
34	TORRES E P， TORRES E A， HERNÁNDEZ-ÁLVAREZ M， et al. EEG-based BCI emotion recognition： a survey［J］. Sensors， 2020， 20（18）： 5083.
35	COAN J A， ALLEN J J B. Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion［J］. Biological Psychology， 2004， 67（1-2）： 7-50.
36	OAKES T R， PIZZAGALLI D A， HENDRICK A M， et al. Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain［J］. Human Brain Mapping， 2004， 21（4）： 257-270.
37	FAUL F， ERDFELDER E， LANG A G， et al. G* power 3： a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social， behavioral， and biomedical sciences［J］. Behavior Research Methods， 2007， 39（2）： 175-191.
38	IRMAK T， POOL D M， HAPPEE R. Objective and subjective responses to motion sickness： the group and the individual［J］. Experimental Brain Research， 2021， 239： 515-531.
39	BENEDEK M， KAERNBACH C. A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity［J］. Journal of Neuroscience Methods， 2010， 190（1）： 80-91.
40	HARMON-JONES E， ALLEN J J. Anger and frontal brain activity： EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence ［J］. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology， 1998， 74（5）： 1310.
41	LOHANI M， PAYNE B R， STRAYER D L. A review of psychophysiological measures to assess cognitive states in real-world driving［J］. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience， 2019， 13： 57.
42	DIAZ-PIEDRA C， SEBASTIÁN M V， DI STASI L L. EEG theta power activity reflects workload among army combat drivers： an experimental study［J］. Brain Sciences， 2020， 10（4）： 199.
43	PARK A H， HU S. Gender differences in motion sickness history and susceptibility to optokinetic rotation-induced motion sickness［J］. Aviation， Space， and Environmental Medicine， 1999， 70（11）： 1077-1080.
44	KESHAVARZ B， STELZMANN D， PAILLARD A， et al. Visually induced motion sickness can be alleviated by pleasant odors［J］. Experimental Brain Research， 2015， 233： 1353-1364.
45	PAILLARD A C， LAMÔRÉ M， ETARD O， et al. Is there a relationship between odors and motion sickness？［J］. Neuroscience Letters， 2014， 566： 326-330.
46	LIEN H C， SUN W M， CHEN Y H， et al. Effects of ginger on motion sickness and gastric slow-wave dysrhythmias induced by circular vection［J］. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology， 2003， 284（3）： G481-G489.

[1]	ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Cheng-Ning, LI Jun-Qiu. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1407 -1414 .
[2]	HAO Han, WANG Si-南, LI Xiao, LIU Zong-Wei, ZHAO Fu-Quan. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 1 -8 .
[3]	XU Cheng-Shan, JIANG Fa-Chao, SONG Sen-Nan, TIAN Guang-Yu. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 9 -14 .
[4]	ZENG Bi-Qiang, GAO Ji-Dong, PENG Wei, SUN Zhen-Dong. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1446 -1451 .
[5]	LI Ling, MA Li, MOU Yu, XU Chao, LI Wen-Ru, SHI Shu-Ming. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1508 -1514 .
[6]	CUI An, LI Bin, WANG Xue-Liang, ZHANG Shi-Zhan. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1521 -1525 .
[7]	DONG Zhu-Rong, ZHANG Xin, HU Song-Hua, QIU Hao. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 79 -85 .
[8]	QIN Xiao-Hui, WANG Jian-Qiang, XIE Bo-Yuan, HU Man-Jiang, LI Ke-Qiang. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 73 -78 .
[9]	ZHAO Liang, ZHANG Qiang, GUO Kong-Hui. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 86 -91 .
[10]	ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Dao-Kui, TONG Rui, QI Hao-Chen. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 47 -51 .

症状	程度	MISC
没有任何不舒服		0
有些不舒服，但无特别症状		1
眩晕，变冷/热，头疼，胃/喉咙难受，出汗，视线模糊，打哈欠，打嗝，疲惫，分泌唾液增多，但不恶心	模糊	2
	轻微	3
	较明显	4
	严重	5
恶心	轻微	6
	较明显	7
	严重	8
	干呕	9
呕吐		10

浓度	10%	20%	30%
反应时间/s	14.8	6.6	5.0
满意度	7.2	7.2	6.4

场景	平均速度/（km·h^-1）	速度标准差/（km·h^-1）
直线道路（采集数据）	59.39	3.48
曲折/颠簸道路（诱导晕车）	25.03	9.59
整体	32.70	18.21

Physiological Manifestation and Relief Method of Passenger’s Carsickness

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 46

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10