Administrator by China Associction for Science and Technology
Sponsored by China Society of Automotive Engineers
Published by AUTO FAN Magazine Co. Ltd.

Automotive Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 1573-1587.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2025.08.013

Previous Articles    

Research on the Forming Quality and Mechanical Properties of Flat-Surface-Overlapped Self-piercing Riveted Aluminum Alloy Joints

Chao Wang1,Wanyuan Yu2(),Aiguo Cheng1,Zhicheng He1,Tao Chen1   

  1. 1.Hunan University,State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology for Vehicle,Changsha 410082
    2.Liuzhou Polytechnic University,Liuzhou 545001
  • Received:2025-01-07 Revised:2025-02-19 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-08-18
  • Contact: Wanyuan Yu E-mail:ywy196364@126.com

Abstract:

A flat-surface-overlapped self-piercing riveting (FS-SPR) process is proposed to improve the joint quality in joining thick aluminum alloy sheets using self-piercing riveting (SPR). Firstly, five different joints are fabricated to study the effect of riveting distance, overlap distance, and overlap surface type. Secondly, the mechanical properties and failure behavior under quasi-static and fatigue loads of FS-SPR joints are investigated through quasi-static and fatigue tests. Finite element simulation is conducted to study the forming mechanism of the FS-SPR process and explore the influence of process parameters on the forming quality of the FS-SPR joints with an inclined overlap surface. The results show that J1, J3, and J4 joints can form good mechanical interlock, while joint J2 fails to form mechanical interlock due to inadequate lower sheet thickness, and J5 joint experiences rivet bending due to large stack thickness. The simulation result shows that the overlap length needs to exceed 40 mm, the riveting position should be to the right of the middle, and the optimization of sheet thickness and rivet length is necessary to improve forming quality. Well-designed J1 and J3 joints outperform the traditional overlapped J5 joint. The peak force and energy absorption of J5 joint are 1.7% and 28.6% lower than J1 joint, and 10.7% and 6.4% lower than J3 joint, respectively. When subjected to the same load level, the fatigue life of J3 joint is on average 70% higher than that of J5 joint.

Key words: aluminum, FS-SPR, forming quality, mechanical properties, finite element simulation