考虑泄漏量的商用车内高频噪声仿真分析与控制*

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2019.011.015

汽车工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1327-1334.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2019.011.015

考虑泄漏量的商用车内高频噪声仿真分析与控制^*

唐荣江¹, 童浙¹, 郑伟光¹, 李申芳¹, 黄莉²

1.桂林电子科技大学机电工程学院,桂林 541000;
2.东风柳州汽车有限公司商用车技术中心,柳州 545005

收稿日期:2018-10-25 出版日期:2019-11-25 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 郑伟光,副教授,博士,E-mail:weiguang.zheng@foxmail.com
基金资助:
广西青年科学基金项目(2018GXNSFBA281012)、广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2018KY0205)、广西制造系统与先进制造技术重点实验室主任基金(17-259-05-010Z)和柳州市科学研究与计划开发项目(2018AA20301)资助

Simulation Analysis and Control of High Frequency Noise in Commercial Vehicles Considering Leakage

Tang Rongjiang¹, Tong Zhe¹, Zheng Weiguang¹, Li Shenfang¹, Huang Li²

1.School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541000;
2.R&D Center of Commercial Vehicle, Dong Feng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd., Liuzhou 545005

Received:2018-10-25 Online:2019-11-25 Published:2019-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为更加真实地模拟驾驶室内声学环境和提高驾驶室内高频噪声的预测精度,将泄漏量应用到SEA建模中,建立了考虑泄漏量的商用车SEA模型。利用伯努利方程推导等效总泄漏面积,将等效总泄漏面积按各个泄漏点的贡献量比例进行分配并添加到模型中仿真。与未考虑泄漏的SEA模型对比,结果显示仿真精度提高,误差减小了1.5 dB(A)左右,与试验结果间的绝对误差在2 dB(A)以内,满足工程上在汽车产品开发设计阶段对车内高频噪声分析预测的要求,从而验证了考虑泄漏量的SEA模型的有效性。在不同泄漏值下对驾驶室内噪声进行仿真计算,得到泄漏量对噪声值影响曲线。结合影响曲线和其他多方面因素,确定了合适的泄漏值为150 SCFM。对主要泄漏点开展有针对性的优化整改,气密性由整改前的268.5降到了149.1 SCFM。对优化整改后的驾驶室内噪声进行测量,结果显示,相比于优化前噪声值在两个工况下分别降低了1.82和1.31 dB(A)。

关键词: 车内噪声, 统计能量分析, 泄漏量, 等效泄漏面积

Abstract: In order to simulate the acoustic environment in the cab more truly and improve the interior noise prediction accuracy, the leakage is applied to SEA modeling and a commercial vehicle SEA model considering leakage is established. Bernoulli equation is used to derive the equivalent leakage area. The equivalent total leakage area is divided by the leakage contribution and added to the model for simulation. In contrast with the SEA model without considering leakage ,the results show that the simulation accuracy is improved and the error is reduced by about 1.5 dB (A) with the absolute error less than 2 dB(A), which meets the engineering requirement of high frequency noise analysis and prediction in vehicle product development and design stage. The SEA model considering leakage is fully validated. Under different leakage values, the interior noise is simulated and the curve of effect of leakage on the noise value is obtained. Combined with the influence curve and many other factors, the suitable leakage value of 150 SCFM is determined. The main leakage points are targeted for optimization and the leakage value drops from 268.5 to 149.1 SCFM. The interior noise after optimization is measured and the results show that the noise values are reduced by 1.82 and 1.31 dB(A) respectively under two working conditions compared with those before optimization.

Key words: interior noise, statistical energy analysis, leakage, equivalent leakage area

唐荣江, 童浙, 郑伟光, 李申芳, 黄莉. 考虑泄漏量的商用车内高频噪声仿真分析与控制^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(11): 1327-1334.

Tang Rongjiang, Tong Zhe, Zheng Weiguang, Li Shenfang, Huang Li. Simulation Analysis and Control of High Frequency Noise in Commercial Vehicles Considering Leakage[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(11): 1327-1334.

参考文献

[1] GENUIT K. The sound quality of vehicle interior noise: a challenge for the NVH-engineers[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration,2004,1(1-2):158-168.
[2] 王彬星,连小珉,郑四发,等.重型货车车内声压级预测[J].汽车工程,2016,38(02):234-241.
[3] 车勇,刘浩,郭顺生,等.基于SEA模型的纯电动汽车车内噪声预测[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2013,35(5):627-630.
[4] CULLA A, AMBROGIO W, FREGOLENT A, et al. Vibroacoustic optimization using a statistical energy analysis model[J]. Journal of Sound & Vibration,2016,375:102-114.
[5] PAN J, SEMENIUK B P, AHLQUIST J, et al. Optimal sound package design using statistical energy analysis[C]. SAE Paper 2003-01-1544.
[6] 陈书明,王登峰,马一功,等.模态密度计算精度对车内噪声预测精度的影响[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2010,40(2):335-340.
[7] CHEN S, WANG D, SONG J, et al. Interior noise prediction and analysis of heavy commercial vehicle cab[C]. SAE Paper 2011-01-2241.
[8] 宋继强,王登峰,马天飞,等.汽车车身复杂子结构模态密度确定方法[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2009,39(S2):269-273.
[9] 张红亮,孔宪仁,刘源,等.宽频域的内损耗因子实验辨识方法研究[J].振动与冲击,2013,32(12):179-184.
[10] THITE A N, MACE B R. The effects of design modifications on the apparent coupling loss factors in SEA-like analysis[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2010,329(24):5194-5208.
[11] 邢鹏,华林,卢炽华,等.基于实验SEA方法的车内噪声预测分析[J].振动.测试与诊断,2017,37(5):928-933+1063-1064.
[12] 贺银芝,杨志刚,王毅刚.汽车车身密封对车内气动噪声影响的机理及试验研究[J].汽车工程,2012,34(8):692-695+744.
[13] 宫镇,夏恒,曾发林,等.高速车辆内部气流噪声的统计能量分析[J].农业机械学报,2003,34(2):7-10.
[14] 刁义宁.重型商用车驾驶室密封性研究与应用[D].青岛:青岛理工大学,2016.
[15] 吴澍平.江铃V3型汽车车身气密性提升方法研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2011.

考虑泄漏量的商用车内高频噪声仿真分析与控制^*

Simulation Analysis and Control of High Frequency Noise in Commercial Vehicles Considering Leakage

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	戴志腾,汪怡平,苏楚奇,王庆洋. 基于MATV的车底高速气流引起的车内噪声计算[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(2): 290-298.
[2]	刘哲,高云凯,徐翔,陈佳举,马超. 关门时车内声场的仿真与试验研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(6): 909-916.
[3]	毕玉华,聂学选,刘少华,肖奔,王鹏,申立中,彭益源. 排气温度、排气流量和海拔高度对SCR系统NO_x转化率和NH₃泄漏量的影响研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(3): 350-357.
[4]	王亓良,陈鑫,张英朝,关青青,张延杰,张岩金,林清龙. 基于直接CAA与SEA的汽车风噪预测与控制[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(1): 86-93.
[5]	冯天培, 孙跃东, 王岩松, 张博强, 刘宁宁, 郭辉. 车内综合烦躁度评价的时序平滑激励级谱CNN模型^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(6): 784-792.
[6]	苏仕见, 徐元利, 弓剑, 夏洪兵, 胡海欧, 霍俊焱. 车身壁板自由阻尼层稳健性优化设计^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(4): 537-544.
[7]	金岩, 赵涛. 发动机半阶次振动引起的车内声品质问题分析和改进[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(3): 396-400.
[8]	刘锋, 吴鸣, 杨军. 量产车型噪声主动控制系统性能实测与分析^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(6): 676-681.
[9]	刘志恩, 黄涛, 邵炯炀, 郑卿卿, 杜松泽, 李秋悦, 屈少举, 刘浩. 汽车急加速进气噪声的试验测试与分析^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(5): 564-570.
[10]	张希玉,张立军,孟德建. 面向车内噪声控制的次级通路建模与验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(10): 1204-1209.