驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略驾驶性主客观评价研究*

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2019.08.001

汽车工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 859-864.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2019.08.001

• • 下一篇

驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略驾驶性主客观评价研究^*

詹军, 刘荣, 陈浩东, 管欣, 王战古

吉林大学,汽车仿真与控制国家重点实验室,长春 130022

收稿日期:2018-10-27 出版日期:2019-08-25 发布日期:2019-09-03
通讯作者: 管欣,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:hsguan@jlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U1664261)、吉林省自然科学基金(20170101209JC)和吉林大学研究生创新基金项目(101832018C205)

Subjective and Objective Driveability Evaluation ofTCU Shift Strategy Driven by Driving Simulator

Zhan Jun, Liu Rong, Chen Haodong, Guan Xin, Wang Zhangu

Jilin University, State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Changchun 130022

Received:2018-10-27 Online:2019-08-25 Published:2019-09-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： TCU换挡策略对汽车驾驶性影响多通过主观评价来测试验证和标定,针对软件在环、硬件在环等仿真方法不能实现对TCU换挡策略的主观评价问题,提出了一种驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略驾驶性评价方法。本文中首先搭建了驾驶模拟器驱动AutoBox嵌入的人车环境闭环TCU换挡策略评价平台,建立能识别驾驶意图和道路环境的TCU换挡策略模型,总结出了TCU换挡策略相关的驾驶性主客观评价表。然后利用搭建的平台对建立的TCU换挡策略进行了驾驶性主客观评价,获得了主观评分结果和客观评价指标。通过分析评价,验证了驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略评价平台的可行性和研究方法的可行性,研究的平台和方法可用于TCU换挡策略驾驶性快速主客观评价,有效减少实车测试评价工作量,降低开发成本,缩短开发周期。

关键词: 驾驶模拟器, TCU, 换挡策略, 驾驶性评价

Abstract: The influence of TCU shift strategy on vehicle driveability is mostly tested and validated by subjective evaluation. For the problem that the subjective evaluation of TCU shift strategy cannot be realized by software-in-the-loop and hardware-in-the-loop simulation methods, a subjective driveability evaluation method of TCU shift strategy by driving simulator is proposed. Firstly, in this paper, the evaluation platform of human-vehicle-environment closed loop TCU shift strategy with embedded driving simulator AutoBox is built, the TCU shift strategy model which can identify driving intention and road environment is established. and the subjective and objective evaluation forms of driveability related to TCU shift strategy are proposed. Then, the subjective and objective evaluation of the established TCU shift strategy is carried out by using the built platform, and the subjective score results and objective evaluation index are obtained. Through analysis and evaluation, the feasibility of drivability evaluation platform on TCU shift strategy with the driving simulator and the research method are verified. The platform and method can be used for the rapid subjective and objective evaluation of driveability of the TCU shift strategy, which effectively reduces the the workload of real vehicle test and evaluation, cuts development costs, and shorten the development cycle

Key words: driving simulator, TCU, shift strategy, driveability evaluation

詹军, 刘荣, 陈浩东, 管欣, 王战古. 驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略驾驶性主客观评价研究^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(8): 859-864.

Zhan Jun, Liu Rong, Chen Haodong, Guan Xin, Wang Zhangu. Subjective and Objective Driveability Evaluation ofTCU Shift Strategy Driven by Driving Simulator[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41(8): 859-864.

参考文献

[1] CABA Z, ATABAY O, GÜNEY A. Driving condition based mode switching optimal controller for improved driveability[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2017,51:698-727.
[2] 路勇,代玉虎,刘磊,等.基于AVL台架的变速器台架试验研究[J].传动技术,2016,30(4):34-37.
[3] 丁华,徐聪.基于驾驶意图识别的DCT模糊换挡策略研究[J].机电工程,2018,35(6):608-612.
[4] MENG F, JIN H. Slope shift strategy for automatic transmission vehicles based on the road gradient[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology,2018,19(3):509-521.
[5] LEI Y, FU Y, LIU K, et al. Research on optimal gearshift strategy for stepped automatic transmission based on vehicle power demand[C]. SAE Paper 2017-01-1108.
[6] 庞权.液力自动变速器(AT)换档规律的仿真建模计算及标定测试[J].内燃机与配件,2018(3):24-28.
[7] 张炳力,王伦珍.双离合自动变速器特殊工况下换挡规律的智能在线修正研究[J].汽车工程,2015,37(6):686-690,730.
[8] CHEN S Y, WU C H, HUNG Y H, et al. Optimal strategies of energy management integrated with transmission control for a hybrid electric vehicle using dynamic particle swarm optimization[J]. Energy,2018,160:154-170.
[9] 夏光,涂波涛,唐希雯,等.基于质量与坡度辨识的汽车自动变速器换挡控制研究[J].汽车工程,2018,40(3):305-312,341.
[10] 王阳.驾驶模拟器驱动的制动系统嵌入式台架研发及仿真研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2017.
[11] VINATTIERI F, WRIGHT T, CAPITANI R, et al. Target setting and structural design of an EPS-in-the-loop test bench for steering feeling simulation[C]. SAE Paper 2016-01-1559.
[12] 孟凡婧,金辉.自动变速车辆下坡换挡策略研究[J].汽车工程,2018,40(2):192-199.
[13] WALTERS T L, SHAW P, KUMAR M M, et al. Analysis lead drivability assessment[C]. SAE Paper 2015-01-2804.
[14] 刘普辉,章桐.基于模糊层次分析法的汽车驾驶性主观评价[J].中国工程机械学报,2016,14(2):181-186.
[15] WI H, PARK J, LEE J. The influence of noise in vehicles on the driver's subjective evaluation of driveability[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering,2017:095440701773049.
[16] 马翔.搭载机电控制CVT纯电动汽车驾驶性研究[D].重庆:重庆理工大学,2017.
[17] 李泉,周云山,王建德,等.改进AHP在CVT车辆驾驶性主观评价中的应用[J].机械科学与技术,2014,33(11):1725-1728.
[18] 段春光.汽车性能模拟器逼真度关键问题研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2017.
[19] AVL-DRIVE shift quality assessment for CHANGAN[R].2010.
[20] Ford_R202 整车道路驾驶评估[R].2006.
[21] 章桐,刘普辉.汽车燃油经济性及动力性与驾驶性客观评价体系[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2015,43(12):1865-1872.

驾驶模拟器驱动的TCU换挡策略驾驶性主客观评价研究^*

Subjective and Objective Driveability Evaluation ofTCU Shift Strategy Driven by Driving Simulator

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	周维,过学迅,裴晓飞,张成才,严军,夏佳磊. 动力总成驾驶性客观评价的工况优选方法与试验验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(3): 358-363.
[2]	周楠, 陈刚. 机器人驾驶车辆深度强化学习换挡策略^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(11): 1473-1481.
[3]	朱镇, 蔡英凤, 陈龙, 夏长高, 田翔, 施德华. 多功能动力传动装置设计方案研究^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(10): 1378-1385.
[4]	徐亮, 石娟, 郑英东, 郭魁元, 秦孔建. 汽车驾驶模拟器主客观评价方法的应用研究^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(10): 1420-1427.
[5]	黄伟,刘海江,李敏. 起动工况驾驶性评价指标特征点识别方法^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(3): 259-265.