乘员与安全气囊初始距离对轻度脑损伤的影响*

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2020.07.006

汽车工程 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 882-886.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2020.07.006

乘员与安全气囊初始距离对轻度脑损伤的影响^*

李海岩, 李鑫杰, 崔世海, 贺丽娟, 阮世捷, 吕文乐

天津科技大学,现代汽车安全技术国际联合研究中心,天津 300222

收稿日期:2019-10-14 出版日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2020-08-14
通讯作者: 李海岩,教授,E-mail:lihaiyan@tust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
*国家自然科学基金(81371360,81471274,81201015)资助。

Effects of Initial Distance Between Occupant and Airbag on Occupant Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Li Haiyan, Li Xinjie, Cui Shihai, He Lijuan, Ruan Shijie, Lü Wenle

Tianjin University of Science and Technology, International Research Association on Emerging Automotive Safety Technology, Tianjin 300222

Received:2019-10-14 Online:2020-07-25 Published:2020-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于已构建且经验证的成人第50百分位头部有限元模型,在LS-DYNA软件中模拟头部与安全气囊不同初始距离的碰撞过程,探究汽车碰撞中安全气囊与头部不同初始距离对乘员轻度脑损伤的影响。仿真中测得颅脑响应参数如HIC₁₅值、脑灰质处压力、脑组织von Mises应力、脑剪切应力等。对结果的分析表明:当乘员头部与安全气囊的距离大于等于290 mm时,引发轻度创伤性脑损伤的概率均低于50%;随着头部与安全气囊的距离减小,颅脑响应参数值会增大,造成颅脑损伤的概率增大。因此汽车碰撞过程中,尽管乘员合理使用安全带,但当乘员头部与安全气囊距离过近时也会引发轻度创伤性脑损伤,建议两者距离应大于290 mm。

关键词: 初始距离, 安全气囊, 轻度创伤性脑损伤, 50百分位头部有限元模型

Abstract: Based on a constructed and validated 50th percentile adult head FE model, the crash process with different initial distances between occupant and airbag is simulated using software LS-DYNA to investigate the effects of initial distance between occupant and airbag on the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) of occupant during vehicle crash. The craniocerebral response parameters of occupant including HIC₁₅, grey matter pressure, the von Mises stress of brain tissue and the shear stress in brain are measured in simulation and the results of analysis show that when the initial distance between occupant and airbag is larger than 290 mm, the probability of leading to occupant mTBI will be less than 50%, and with the reduction of the distance between occupant and airbag, the craniocerebral response parameters and hence the probability of occupant mTBI increase. Therefore, even though occupant uses safety belt properly during crash, mTBI may also occur if occupant is too close to airbag, so it is suggested that the distance between occupant and airbag should larger than 290 mm.

Key words: initial distance, airbags, mild traumatic brain injury, 50th percentile head FE model

李海岩, 李鑫杰, 崔世海, 贺丽娟, 阮世捷, 吕文乐. 乘员与安全气囊初始距离对轻度脑损伤的影响^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(7): 882-886.

Li Haiyan, Li Xinjie, Cui Shihai, He Lijuan, Ruan Shijie, Lü Wenle. Effects of Initial Distance Between Occupant and Airbag on Occupant Mild Traumatic Brain Injury[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(7): 882-886.

参考文献

[1] KERRY M I, FRIESEN C L, MACKENZIE D E, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: a scoping review[J]. PLOSONE,2017,12(4):0174847.
[2] National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Report to congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: steps to prevent a serious public health problem[R]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta,2003.
[3] MCCRORY P, MEEUWISSE W, JOHNSTON K, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport[C]. The 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2008.
[4] KARLIN A M. Concussion in the pediatric and adolescent population: different population, different concerns[J]. Pm & R,2011,3(S2).
[5] SAHOO D, DECK C, WILLINGER R. Brain injury tolerance limit based on computation of axonal strain[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,2016,92:53-70.
[6] MEYTHALER J M, PEDUZZI J D, EEFTHERIN E, et al. Current concepts: diffuse axonal injury associated traumatic brain injury[J]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,2001,82(10):1461-1471.
[7] World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety[R]. Department of Violenceand Injury Prevention and Disability (VIP),2010.
[8] KLEIVEN S. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal,2007,51(5):81.
[9] SHREIBER D I, BAIN A C, MEANEY D F, et al. In vivo thresholds for mechanical injury to the blood-brain barrier[C]. SAE Paper 973335.
[10] ANDERSON R W G, BROWN C J, et al. Mechanics of axonal injury: an experimental and numerical study of a sheep model of head impact[C]. Proc. 1999 IRCOBI Conf. Sitges, Spain,1999.
[11] WILLINGER R, BAUMGARTNER D. Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness,2003,8(6):605-617.
[12] ZHANG L, YANG K H, KING A I. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,2004,126(2):226-236.
[13] BAIN A C, MEANEY D F. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,2001,122(6):615-622.
[14] GALBRAITH J A, THIBAULT L E, MATTESON D R. Mechanical and electrical responses of the squid giant axon to simple elongation[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,1993,115(1):13-22.
[15] TAKHOUNTS E G, CRAIG M J, MOORHOUSE K, et al. Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC)[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal,2013,57:243-266.
[16] ZHAO W, RUAN S, LI H, et al. A study on the directional sensitivity of intracranial responses following head impact[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Safety,2014,7(2):199-208.
[17] 崔世海,王晨.安全气囊爆炸时儿童离位距离与颅脑损伤的关系[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(9).
[18] MEYER F, WILLINGER R. Three-year-old child head-neck finite element modelling: simulation of the interaction with airbag in frontal and side impact[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Safety,2009,4(4):285.

乘员与安全气囊初始距离对轻度脑损伤的影响^*

Effects of Initial Distance Between Occupant and Airbag on Occupant Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘刚,洪亮,葛如海. 面向“离位”儿童乘员的常开式安全气囊优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(1): 94-104.
[2]	洪亮,刘刚,葛如海. 基于12岁儿童损伤阈值的主动式安全气囊多目标优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(6): 861-869.
[3]	葛如海,黄可鑫,蔡朝阳,顾瑶芝,陈宇航. 校车连体型主动式安全气囊保护效果的研究优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(12): 1800-1805.
[4]	葛如海, 崔义忠, 洪亮, 肖轩. 基于NSGA-Ⅱ的主动式安全气囊参数优化^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(9): 1216-1223.
[5]	葛如海, 崔义忠, 洪亮, 肖轩. 针对12岁儿童的主动式安全气囊的优化^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(6): 771-777.
[6]	颜凌波,解文娜,许伟,曹立波,戴宏亮,张恺. 正面碰撞中基于中国人体尺寸的假人损伤响应研究^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(3): 289-297.