车辆碰撞中乘员骨盆力学响应特性的研究*

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2020.04.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文旨在研究车辆碰撞中乘员骨盆损伤机理和年龄对碰撞响应的影响。首先开发并验证了老年人骨盆的有限元模型。其次,对比研究了3个具有不同年龄特征的骨盆模型(老年骨盆模型、中年骨盆模型GHBMC和儿童骨盆模型CHARM-10)在材料特性、生理特征、力学响应和损伤方面的差异。结果表明:具有相似生理几何尺寸的老年骨盆模型和中年骨盆模型与儿童骨盆模型相比有较大的差异。侧面碰撞实验的结果表明,3种年龄骨盆模型中,老年骨盆模型的碰撞峰值力和受力最大时位移量都最大,而碰撞中最大位移却最小。对碰撞响应数据进行拟合的结果表明,3种年龄骨盆模型的碰撞峰值力皆随冲击能量呈指数增长,而碰撞中最大位移量则随冲击能量呈线性增长。应力云图分析结果表明,骨盆在侧向冲击下最易受伤或骨折的部位是耻骨支、骶髂关节和髋臼。

关键词: 骨盆模型, 力学响应, 骨折

Abstract: The mechanism of occupant pelvis injury and the effects of age on its impact response are studied in this paper. Firstly the finite element model for the elder pelvis is developed and verified. Then, three pelvis models with different age characteristics (elder pelvis model, middle-aged pelvis model GHBMC and child pelvis model CHARM-10) are used to compare their differences in material properties, physiological characteristics, mechanical response and impact injury. The results show that the elder and middle-aged pelvis models have similar physiological geometry, but they are quite different from the child pelvis model. The results of side impact experiment indicate that among three pelvis models for different ages, the elder pelvis model has the largest peak impact force and deflection at maximum force, but has the smallest deflection under impact. According to the fitting of impact response data, with the rise of impact energy, the peak impact force exhibits an exponential increase while the maximum deflection shows a linear increase for all three pelvis models of different ages. Finally the results of analysis on stress nephogram indicate that the parts of pelvis prone to injury and fracture are ischio-pubic rami, iliac-sacral junction and acetabulum

Key words: pelvis model, mechanical response, fracture

武和全, 侯海彬, 胡林. 车辆碰撞中乘员骨盆力学响应特性的研究^*[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(4): 468-476.

Wu Hequan, Hou Haibin, Hu Lin. Study on Mechanical Response Characteristicsof Occupant Pelvis in Vehicle Crash[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 468-476.

参考文献

[1] 马春生,张金换,黄世霖.基于试验设计的汽车侧面碰撞结构改进[J].汽车工程,2014,36(2):195-198.
[2] 董学勤,朱西产,马志雄,等.基于零部件试验的汽车侧面碰撞假人伤害的研究[J].汽车工程,2012,34(10):894-897.
[3] 程秀生.模拟汽车侧面碰撞的人体骨盆损伤的试验研究[J].汽车工程,1998,20(5):266-271.
[4] TENCER A F, KAUFMAN R, MACK C, et al. Factors affecting pelvic and thoracic forces in near-side impact crashes: a study of US-NCAP, NASS, and CIREN data[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,2005,37(2):287-293.
[5] FORMAN J L, LOPEZVALDES F J, DUPREY S, et al. The tolerance of the human body to automobile collision impact-a systematic review of injury biomechanics research,1990-2009[J]. Accident; Analysis and Prevention,2015,80:7-17.
[6] DEMETRIADES D, KARAISKAKIS M, VELMAHOS G C, et al. Pelvic fractures in pediatric and adult trauma patients: are they different injuries? [J]. Journal of Trauma & Acute Care Surgery,2003,54(6):1146-1151.
[7] GRISONI N, CONNOR S, MARSH E, et al. Pelvic fractures in a pediatric level I trauma center[J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2002,16(7):458-463.
[8] ISMAIL N, BELLEMARE J F, MOLLITT D L, et al. Death from pelvic fracture: children are different[J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery,1996,31(1):82-85.
[9] DEFRANCESCO C J, SANKAR W N. Traumatic pelvic fractures in children and adolescents[J]. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery,2017,26(1):27-35.
[10] SWAID F, PELEG K, ALFICI R, et al. A comparison study of pelvic fractures and associated abdominal injuries between pediatric and adult blunt trauma patients[J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery,2017,52(3):386-389.
[11] MORRIS R O, SONIBARE A, GREEN D J, et al. Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards[J]. Postgraduate Medical Journal,2000,76:646-650.
[12] BOUFOUS S, FINCH C, LORD S, et al. The increasing burden of pelvic fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia[J]. Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured,2005,36(11):1323-1329.
[13] KIM J E, LI Z, ITO Y, et al. Finite element model development of a child pelvis with optimization-based material identification[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2009,42(13):2191-2195.
[14] BEASON D P, DAKIN G J, LOPEZ R R, et al. Bone mineral density correlates with fracture load in experimental side impacts of the pelvis[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2003,36(2):219-227.
[15] DAKIN G J, ARBELAEZ R A, ALONSO J E, et al. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of the human pubic symphysis joint: effects of lateral impact loading[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,2001,123(3):218-226.
[16] GUILLEMOT H, ROBIN S, COZ J Y L, et al. Pelvic behavior in side collisions: static and dynamic tests on isolated pelvic bones[C]. Windsor, on, Canada,1998:1412-1424.
[17] OUYANG J, ZHU Q A, ZHAO W D, et al. Experimental cadaveric study of lateral impact of the pelvis in children[J]. Journal of First Military Medical University,2003,23(5):397-408.
[18] MIZUNO K, IWATA K, DEGUCHI T, et al. Development of a Three-Year-Old child FE model[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention,2005,6(4):361-371.
[19] SONG E, TROSSEILLE X, GUILLEMOT H. Side impact: influence of impact conditions and bone mechanical properties on pelvic response using a fracturable pelvis model[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal,2006,50(50):75-95.
[20] DALSTRA M, HUISKES R, Van ERNING L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,1995,117(3):272-278.
[21] YAMADA H, EVANS G F. Strength of biological materials[M]. Williams & Wilkins,1970:47-49.
[22] PHILLIPS A T, PANKAJ P, HOWIE C R, et al. Finite element modelling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions[J]. Medical Engineering & Physics,2007,29(7):739-748.
[23] SHEN M, ZHU F, JIANG B, et al. Development and a limited validation of a whole-body finite element pedestrian and occupant models of a 10-year-old child[J]. International Journal of Eating Disorders,2015,48(7):826-841.
[24] UNTAROIU C D, et al. The finite element model of the GHBMC pelvis and lower extremities (LS-Dyna Version)[G]. User Manual,2011.
[25] NICHOLAS A V, MATTHEW L D, JOEL D S, et al. Quantitative validation of a human body finite element model using rigid body imacts[J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering,2015,43(9):2163-2174.
[26] VAZ G, ROUSSOULY P, BERTHONNAUD E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine[J]. European Spine Journal,2002,11(1):80-87.
[27] SCHOELL S L, WEAVER A A, URBAN J E, et al. Development and validation of an older occupant finite element model of a mid-sized male for investigation of age-related injury risk[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal,2015,59:359-383.
[28] ALTON T B, GEE A O. Classifications in brief: young and burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research^®,2014,472(8):2338-2342.

车辆碰撞中乘员骨盆力学响应特性的研究^*

Study on Mechanical Response Characteristicsof Occupant Pelvis in Vehicle Crash

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李海岩,胡静,贺丽娟,冉令华,吕文乐,崔世海,阮世捷. 中国体征第五百分位女性汽车乘员损伤仿生模型开发及验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(10): 1965-1974.
[2]	李海岩,苏航杰,祝贺,刘冲,王彦鑫,崔世海,贺丽娟,王一达,吕文乐. 中国体征3岁儿童乘员损伤仿生模型在C-NCAP正面碰撞测试仿真中的应用[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(12): 1944-1953.
[3]	武和全,张家飞,任启凡,胡林. 不同角度正面碰撞中老年驾驶员下肢模型的响应研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(5): 739-745.
[4]	崔世海,马伟盛,李海岩,贺丽娟,吕文乐. 城市公交车内儿童乘员头部损伤的有限元分析[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(3): 414-420.
[5]	武和全,张家飞,胡林. 自动驾驶中座椅旋转速度对乘员的影响[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(2): 226-231.