燃料电池系统仿真分析及测试验证

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2023.09.019

Abstract

Abstract:

The fuel cell system includes stack， air subsystem， hydrogen subsystem， cooling subsystem， involving many components. Therefore， in the early stage of research and development， establishment of a fuel cell system model through system simulation has a guiding role for system development. Firstly， based on the test results and characteristic parameters of components， virtual calibration of components is carried out to establish an accurate component model. Then， according to the system flow chart， a complete fuel cell system simulation model is built. Finally， key output performance parameters of the system are evaluated and predicted through simulation calculation. Comparing the simulation results with the test data， the results show that the maximum average absolute percentage error between the model simulation results and the test data is 4.33%， with a high degree of consistency. It is verified that the simulation model has a high accuracy and can be used to study the performance of the fuel cell system， which has great guiding significance for future research and development of the fuel cell system.

Key words: fuel cell, system simulation, model, test validation

Youwei Xu,Guiyin Chen,Lü Ping,Zhenrui Zhao,Yangyang Zhao,Maoxi Sun,Danmin Xing. Simulation Analysis and Test Validation of Fuel Cell System[J].Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1710-1719.

Figures/Tables 22

References 19

1	TROUT K， MUTTITT G， LAFLEUR D， et al. Existing fossil fuel extraction would warm the world beyond 1.5degreesC［J］. Environ Res Lett， 2022， 17： 1-12.
2	MURTY VVSN， KUMAR A. Multi-objective energy management in microgrids with hybrid energy sources and battery energy storage systems［J］. Prot Control Mod Power Syst， 2020， 5：1-20.
3	LOGN B E. Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology， 2010， 85 （6）： 1665-1671.
4	PERERA F P. Multiple threats to child health from fossil fuel combustion： impacts of air pollution and climate change［J］. Environmental Health Perspectives， 2017， 125 （2）： 141-148.
5	李欣民. 清洁能源发电技术及市场现状研究［J］.电力需求侧管理， 2017， 19 （6）： 29-32.
	LI X M. The study of clean power energy generation technology and market development status［J］. Power Demand Side Management， 2017， 19 （6）： 29-32.
6	陈国平，李明节，许涛，等. 我国电网支撑可再生能源发展的实践与挑战［J］. 电网技术， 2017， 41（10）： 3095-3103.
	CHEN G P， LI M J， XU T， et al.Practice and challenge of renewable energy development based on interconnected power grids［J］. Power System Technology， 2017， 41（10）： 3095-3103.
7	CHEN H， ZHAO X， QU B， et al. An evaluation method of gas distribution quality in dynamic process of proton exchange membrane fuel cell［J］. Applied Energy， 2018， 232： 26–35.
8	O’HAYRE R， CHAS W， COLELLA W， et al. Fuel cell fundamentals［M］. New York： John Wiley and Sons， Inc， 2009.
9	巴尔伯.PEM燃料电池：理论与实践［M］.北京：机械工业出版社，2016.
	BARBIR F. PEM fuel cells： theory and practice［M］. Beijing： China Machine Press， 2016.
10	潘瑞，杨朵，汪玉洁，等. 基于AMESim的质子交换膜燃料电池系统仿真［J］. 系统仿真技术及其应用， 2018， 19：154-157.
	PAN R， YANG D， WANG Y J， et al. Simulation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system based on AMESim［J］. System Simulation Technology & Application， 2018， 19： 154-157.
11	刘冬安，陈俊超，蔡吉闽. 基于AMESim的燃料电池汽车储氢系统仿真［J］. 电池工业， 2019， 23（5）： 253-258.
	LIU D A， CHEN J C， CAI J M. A simulation of fuel cell vehicle hydrogen system based on AMESim［J］. Chinese Battery Industry， 2019， 23（5）： 253-258.
12	卢炽华，王良旭，刘志恩，等. 燃料电池汽车整车热管理系统设计与仿真分析［J］. 重庆大学学报， 2022， 45（10）： 48-61.
	LU C H， WANG L X， LIU Z E， et al. Design and simulation analysis of the whole vehicle thermal management system for the fuel cell vehicle［J］. Journal of Chongqing University， 2022， 45（10）： 48-61.
13	李名剑，史建鹏，贺挺，等. 基于AMESim的燃料电池空气系统动态仿真［J］. 电池工业， 2020，24（1）： 8-13.
	LI M J， SHI J P， HE T， et al. A dynamic simulation of fuel cell air sub-system based on AMESim［J］. Chinese Battery Industry， 2020， 24（1）： 8-13.
14	刘冬安，陈俊超，蒋永伟. 燃料电池汽车空气系统的仿真与验证［J］. 电池工业， 2020， 24（3）： 115-120.
	LIU D A， CHEN J C， CAI J M. Simulation and validation of fuel cell vehicle air supply system［J］. Chinese Battery Industry， 2020， 24（3）： 115-120.
15	张磊，王仁广，徐元利，等. 基于AMESim的燃料电池系统仿真与分析［J］. 汽车工程师， 2020（3）： 32-36.
	ZHANG L， WANG R G， XU Y L， et al. Simulation and analysis of fuel cell system based on AMESim［J］. Auto Engineer， 2020（3）： 32-36.
16	AMPHLETT J C，BAUMERT R M，MANN R F， et al. Performance modeling of the Ballard mark-IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell［J］. Journal of Electrochemical Society， 1995， 142（1）： 9-15.
17	MORAAL P， KOLMANOVSKY I. Turbocharger modeling for automotive control applications［C］. SAE Paper 1999-01-0908.
18	BASCHUK J J， LI X G. Modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with variable degrees of water flooding［J］. Journal of Power Sources， 2000， 86： 181-196.
19	MCCLOY D， MARTIN H. Control of fluid power： analysis and design［M］. 2nd ed， Ellis Horwood Limited， 1980.

[1]	ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Cheng-Ning, LI Jun-Qiu. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1407 -1414 .
[2]	HAO Han, WANG Si-南, LI Xiao, LIU Zong-Wei, ZHAO Fu-Quan. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 1 -8 .
[3]	XU Cheng-Shan, JIANG Fa-Chao, SONG Sen-Nan, TIAN Guang-Yu. [J]. , 2017, 39(1): 9 -14 .
[4]	CUI An, LI Bin, WANG Xue-Liang, ZHANG Shi-Zhan. [J]. , 2016, 38(12): 1521 -1525 .
[5]	WANG Guo-Chun, LI Qi-Qi, DAI Jiang-Lu, CHENG Ai-Guo, LI Tie-Zhu. [J]. , 2017, 39(2): 168 -173 .
[6]	. [J]. , 0, (): 0 .
[7]	LIN Xin-You, MO Li-Ping, LUO Yong, ZHANG Shao-Bo. [J]. , 2017, 39(4): 369 -375 .
[8]	FU Bing-Zheng, YANG Zheng-Jun, YIN Hang, ZHOU Xiao-Yan, TAN Jian-Wei, GE Yun-Shan. [J]. , 2017, 39(4): 376 -380 .
[9]	LI Ling, SHI Shu-Ming, WANG Xian-Bin, ZHANG Xiang-Dong. [J]. , 2017, 39(4): 440 -446 .
[10]	. Coordinated Control of Adaptive Cruise Control System for Distributed Electric Vehicles[J]. , 0, (): 0 .

参数	数值
单电池参考电压	1.25 V
电堆节数	370
阳极换热面积	50 000 cm²
阳极换热系数	100 W/（m²·℃）
阴极换热面积	50 000 cm²
阴极换热系数	100 W/（m²·℃）
冷却流道对流换热面积	100 000 cm²
冷却流道对流换热系数	1 500 W/（m²·℃）

参数	数值
空气环境温度	20 ℃
空气环境压力	0 kPa
阴极氧气初始体积分数	21%
阴极氮气初始体积分数	78%
阴极水蒸气初始体积分数	1%

参数	数值
氢气高压初始压力	35 000 kPa
阳极氢气初始体积分数	99.99%
阳极水蒸气初始体积分数	0.01%

参数	数值
环境温度	20 ℃
环境压力	0 kPa
散热风扇等效面积	420 mm²
散热风扇临界流量数	2 000
过滤器临界流量系数	1 000

零部件	平均误差/%
空压机	2.29
中冷器	0.53
节气门	3.68
引射器	1.21
水泵	0.68
过滤器	2.14

Simulation Analysis and Test Validation of Fuel Cell System

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 19

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

对比项	MAPE/%
电堆空气入口压力仿真与测试对比	1.47
电堆氢气入口压力仿真与测试对比	1.35
电堆空气入口流量仿真与测试对比	3.33
电堆进水温度仿真与测试对比	2.97
电堆出水温度仿真与测试对比	4.33

[1]	Xu Hao,Xiantao Lu,Jing Yang,Yali Zheng,Hewu Wang. Modeling on the Penetration Rate of China's Commercial Vehicle Market: Taking Heavy-Duty Long-Haul Trucks as an Example [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 253-259.
[2]	Weifeng Kong,Chuan Fang,Jihong Liu,Jianqiu Li,Feiqiang Li,Shengtao Huang,Xingwang Zhao,Yan Shi,Dian Yuan,Liangfei Xu,Peng Sun,Enfei Zhou,Minggao Ouyang. Research on Fuel Cell Cold Start Strategy Based on Single Cell Impedance Consistency Purging [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 260-268.
[3]	A’ bang Tao,Jianjian Tao,Xuezhe Wei. Impedance Spectroscopy and Characteristic Frequency Analysis of the PEMFC Cold Start Process [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 269-280.
[4]	Yanxin Wang,Haiyan Li,Shihai Cui,Lijuan He,Lü Wenle. Research on Prediction Model and Assessment Parameters of Head Injury for Child Occupants Based on BP Neural Network [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 329-336.
[5]	Hongyu Hu, Yechen Li, Zhengguang Zhang, You Qu, Lei He, Zhenhai Gao. Driver Behavior Recognition Based on Multi-scale Skeleton Graph and Local Visual Context Method [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 1-8.
[6]	Junnian Wang, Chuantai Cheng, Fei Gao, Tiejun Fu, Jindong Ren. An Experimental Study on Optimal H-Point and Seat Parameters for Shared Car Drivers [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 39-49.
[7]	Yanli Ma, Qin Qin, Fangqi Dong, Yining Lou. Takeover Risk Assessment Model Based on Risk Field Theory Under Different Cognitive Secondary Tasks [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 9-17.
[8]	Zheng Zuo,Yunpeng Wang,Bin Ma,Bosong Zou,Yaoguang Cao,Shichun Yang. Quantitative Evaluation and Analysis of On-board Network Components Risk Rate Based on AFC-TARA [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1553-1562.
[9]	Gaoshi Zhao,Long Chen,Yingfeng Cai,Yubo Lian,Hai Wang,Qingchao Liu,Chenglong Teng. Trajectory Prediction Technology Integrating Complex Network and Memory-Augmented Network [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1608-1616.
[10]	Tianfei Ma,Bo Li,Bing Zhu,Jian Zhao. Ultrasonic Radar Modeling of Automatic Parking System Considering Atmospheric Conditions Effect [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1646-1654.
[11]	Xinjie Yuan,Fang Liu,Zhongjun Hou. Self-adaptive Porous Structure Detection of the Catalyst Layer in PEMFCs Based on GA-PSO-Otsu Algorithm [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1702-1709.
[12]	Wanteng Wang,Nan Li,Xueyi Bai,Dou Yang,Hang Li,Guijing Li. Research on Effect of Gas Diffusion Layer Layered Design on the Performance of PEMFC Stack [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1720-1727.
[13]	Xin Shi,Jian Zhu,Xiangmo Zhao,Fei Hui,Junyan Ma. Car-Following Model for Connected Vehicles Based on Multiple Vehicles with State Change Features [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1309-1319.
[14]	Ming Wang,Xiaolin Tang,Kai Yang,Guofa Li,Xiaosong Hu. A Motion Planning Method for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Prediction Risk [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1362-1372.
[15]	Da Li,Junjun Deng,Zhaosheng Zhang,Peng Liu,Zhenpo Wang. Review on Power Battery Safety Warning Strategy in Electric Vehicles [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1392-1407.