PEMFC金属泡沫流场全形态三维性能模拟及结构优化

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2025.07.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Flow field design is the key to improve the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells （PEMFC）. High-porosity metal foam materials have been suggested as substitute flow fields for PEMFC. In this paper， the entire morphology of the metal foam is reconstructed. A PEMFC model with four different metal foams （10 PPI， 20 PPI， 40 PPI， and 100 PPI） as the cathode flow field is established， which is compared with traditional parallel and serpentine flow fields. It is found that the metal foam flow field can strongly enhance the electrochemical reaction process by efficiently improving the transportation and distribution of reactive gases and products in the flow channel， and the larger the PPI value of metal foam material， the better the output performance. In addition， after examining the impact of various gas diffusion layer porosities on the PEMFC with metal foam flow field， it is determined that a porosity range of 0.4–0.6 is appropriate. A wide-ligament 40 PPI metal foam structural enhancement approach based on an umbrella is suggested in this study， and the output performance of PEMFC is further enhanced.

Key words: proton exchange membrane fuel cell, morphology reconstruction, flow field, metal foam, structural enhancement

Nan Li,Xueyi Bai,Dou Yang,Guijing Li,Shihui Ma. Morphology 3D Performance Simulation and Structural Optimization of PEMFC Metal Foam Flow Field[J].Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(7): 1277-1284.

Figures/Tables 13

References 28

[1]	ZHU X， ZHOU W， ZHU Z， et al. Performance analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with traveling-wave flow fields based on Grey-relational theory［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2023， 48（2）： 740-756.
[2]	GONG F， YANG X L， ZHANG X， et al. The study of Tesla valve flow field on the net power of proton exchange membrane fuel cell［J］. Appl Energy， 2023， 329： 120276.
[3]	刘英杰，陈奔. 质子交换膜燃料电池流场强化传质研究进展［J］. 汽车工程， 2021， 43（6）： 799-807，814.
	LIU Y J， CHEN B. Progress of flow field enhanced mass transfer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells［J］. Automotive Engineering， 2021， 43（6）： 799-807，814.
[4]	AFSHARI E， ZIAEI-RAD M， SHARIATI Z. A study on using metal foam as coolant fluid distributor in the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2016， 41（3）： 1902-1912.
[5]	KUMAR A， REDDY R G. Modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with metal foam in the flow-field of the bipolar/end plates［J］. Power Sources 2003， 114（1）： 54-62.
[6]	HUO S， COOPER N J， SMITH T L， et al. Experimental investigation on PEM fuel cell cold start behavior containing porous metal foam as cathode flow distributor［J］. Applied Energy， 2017， 203： 101-114.
[7]	KANG D G， LEE D K， CHOI J M， et al. Study on the metal foam flow field with porosity gradient in the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell［J］. Renewable Energy， 2020， 156： 931-941.
[8]	CHEN X， YANG C， SUN Y， et al. Water management and structure optimization study of nickel metal foam as flow distributors in proton exchange membrane fuel cell［J］. Applied Energy， 2022， 309： 118448.
[9]	ZHANG G， JIAO K. Three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of PEMFC at high current density utilizing Eulerian-Eulerian model and two-fluid model［J］. Energy Conversion and Management， 2018， 176： 409-421.
[10]	CARTON J G， OLABI A G. Representative model and flow characteristics of open pore cellular foam and potential use in proton exchange membrane fuel cells［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2015， 40（16）： 5726-5738.
[11]	CARTON J G， OLABI A G. Three-dimensional proton exchange membrane fuel cell model： comparison of double channel and open pore cellular foam flow plates［J］. Energy， 2017， 136： 185-195.
[12]	TAO X， SUN K， CHEN Z W T， et al. Two-phase flow in porous metal foam flow fields of PEM fuel cells［J］. Chemical Engineering Science， 2023， 282： 119270.
[13]	JO A， AHN S， OH K， et al. Effects of metal foam properties on flow and water distribution in polymer electrolyte fuel cells （PEFCs）［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2018， 43（30）： 14034-14046.
[14]	LIM K， VAZ N， LEE J， et al. Advantages and disadvantages of various cathode flow field designs for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2020， 163： 120497.
[15]	ZHANG G， BAO Z， XIE B， et al. Three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of PEM fuel cell considering the full morphology of metal foam flow field［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2021， 46（3）： 2978-2989.
[16]	LI Z X， BAI F， HE P， et al. Three-dimensional performance simulation of PEMFC of metal foam flow plate reconstructed with improved full morphology［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2023， 48： 27778-27789.
[17]	BAO Z， NIU Z， JIAO K. Numerical simulation for metal foam two-phase flow field of proton exchange membrane fuel cell［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2019， 44（12）： 6229-6244.
[18]	ZHANG S Y， QU Z G， XU H T， et al. A numerical study on the performance of PEMFC with wedge-shaped fins in the cathode channel［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2021， 46（54）： 27700-27708.
[19]	CHEN X， YU Z K， YANG C， et al. Performance investigation on a novel 3D wave flow channel design for PEMFC［J］. Hydrogen Energy， 2021， 46： 11127-11139.
[20]	喻强，汪宏斌，陈卓.相对湿度对PEMFC膜电极影响的数值模拟［J］.太阳能学报， 2021， 42（12）： 343-348.
	YU Q， WANG H B， CHEN Z. Numerical simulation of the effect of relative humidity on PEMFC membrane electrodes［J］. Journal of Solar Energy， 2021， 42（12）： 343-348.
[21]	焦魁，王博文，杜青，等. 质子交换膜燃料电池水热管理［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2020.
	JIAO K， WANG B W， DU Q， et al. Hydrothermal management of proton exchange membrane fuel cells［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2020.
[22]	BERNING T， DJILALI N. Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell—a parametric study［J］. Journal of Power Sources， 2003， 124（2）： 440-452.
[23]	CATLIM G， ADVANI S G， PRASAD A K. Optimization of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell flow channels using a genetic algorithm［J］. Journal of Power Sources， 2011， 196（22）： 9407-9418.
[24]	ANYANWUI S， HOU Y， XI F，et al. Comparative analysis of two-phase flow in sinusoidal channel of different geometric configurations with application to PEMFC［J］. Hydrogen Energy， 2019， 44： 13807-13819.
[25]	SEZGIN B， CAGLAYAN D G， DEVRIM Y， et al. Modeling and sensitivity analysis of high temperature PEM fuel cells by using Comsol Multiphysics［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2016， 41（23）： 10001-10009.
[26]	FOURIE J G， PLESSIS J P D. Pressure drop modelling in cellular metallic foams［J］. Chemical Engineering Science， 2002， 57（14）： 2781-2789.
[27]	OZMAT B， LEYDA B， BENSON B. Thermal applications of open-cell metal foams［J］. Advanced Manufacturing Processes， 2004， 19（5）： 839-862.
[28]	李姣，郭航，叶芳. 气体扩散层结构对 PEMFC 性能影响二维数值模拟［J］. 热科学与技术， 2023， 22（4）： 341-350.
	LI J， GUO H， YE F. Two-dimensional numerical simulation of the effect of gas diffusion layer structure on PEMFC performance［J］. Thermal Science and Technology， 2023， 22（4）： 341-350.

PPI	10	20	40	100
孔径/mm	2.54	1.27	0.64	0.254
韧带直径/mm	0.152 4	0.076 2	0.038 4	0.015 24
边长/mm	1.015 09	0.507 54	0.253 8	0.101 51

参数	数值
MEA长度/mm	8
MEA宽度/mm	3.2
BP高度/mm	0.55
BP宽度/mm	3
直通道高度/mm	0.4
直通道宽度/mm	0.5
肋宽度/mm	0.5
GDL厚度/mm	0.12
CL厚度/mm	0.01
PEM厚度/mm	2.5×10^-2
GDL孔隙度	0.4
CL孔隙度	0.4
GDL渗透率/m²	1.18×10^-11
气体扩散层电导率/（S·m^-1）	222
质子交换膜电导率/（S·m^-1）	9.825
加湿温度/K	301.15
阳极化学计量比	1.5
阴极化学计量比	2.2
参考压力/Pa	1.01×10⁵
开路电压/V	1
工作温度/K	353.15
阳极参考交换电流密度/（A·m^-2）	1×10²
阴极参考交换电流密度/（A·m^-2）	1×10^-2
入口水的摩尔分数	0.037 32
入口氢的摩尔分数	0.962 68
入口氧的摩尔分数	0.202 16
氢气质量流率/（kg·s^-1）	3.9798×10^-9
氮气质量流率/（kg·s^-1）	1.5371×10^-7
氧气质量流率/（kg·s^-1）	4.67011×10^-8
阳极总质量流率/（kg·s^-1）	5.3684×10^-9
阴极总质量流率/（kg·s^-1）	2.0526×10^-7

网格数量	电流密度/（A·m^-2）	相对误差/%
95 839	7 960.7
115 048	8 100.3	1.75
132 756	7 911.8	2.33
243 321	7 775.9	1.72
624 242	7 641.6	1.73
2 339 461	7 610.0	0.41

Morphology 3D Performance Simulation and Structural Optimization of PEMFC Metal Foam Flow Field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Jixuan Lu,Weibo Zheng,Xiang Li,Qianqian Wang,Bing Li,Pingwen Ming. Overview of Research Progress on Hydrogen Permeation in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells and Mitigation Measures [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(7): 1238-1257.
[2]	Guangwei Li,Xue Han,Danmin Xing,Pingwen Ming. Research on Effect of Catalyst Layer/Microporous Layer Interface Design on the PEMFC [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 77-84.
[3]	Lihai Ren,Lili Chen,Zhenhua Yang,Chengyue Jiang,Qingjiang Zhao,Xi Liu,Yuanzhi Hu. Research on PEMFC Mechanical-Electrical Coupling Modeling and Electrical Response Under Impact Load [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 96-106.
[4]	Zhigang Yang,Yujing Li,Chao Xia,Mengjia Wang,Lei Yu. A High Time-Resolution Reconstruction on the Automotive Turbulent Wake Based on LSTM-POD [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(7): 1302-1313.
[5]	Yuxiang Peng,Qinghua Yu,Rui Ao,Fuwu Yan. Performance Analysis of Elastocaloric Cooler Driven by Waste Heat from Fuel Cell [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 662-668.
[6]	Xiang Xu,Yuan Wang,Yilong Yu,Dan Wang,Wei Wang,Junfang Xu,Lijun Zhang. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Research on the Flow Field of Automobile in Environmental Wind Tunnel [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 536-545.
[7]	Xinjie Yuan,Fang Liu,Zhongjun Hou. Self-adaptive Porous Structure Detection of the Catalyst Layer in PEMFCs Based on GA-PSO-Otsu Algorithm [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1702-1709.
[8]	Wanteng Wang,Nan Li,Xueyi Bai,Dou Yang,Hang Li,Guijing Li. Research on Effect of Gas Diffusion Layer Layered Design on the Performance of PEMFC Stack [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1720-1727.
[9]	Wei Zhang,Long Jiang,Liping Meng,Zehong Li,Zhaohui Chen,Zhijun Li. Influence of Ash Plug Distribution in DPF on Particle Trapping Characteristics [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(3): 438-450.
[10]	Lü Ping,Xin Sun,Youwei Xu,Bao Zhang,Jiahui Xu,Danmin Xing. An Experimental Study on Low Temperature Shutdown and Purging of Vehicle Fuel Cell Stack [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 2123-2129.
[11]	Jiqing Chen,Changjing Zeng,Yunjiao Zhou,Fengchong Lan,Qingshan Liu. Flow Field Structure Optimization and Performance Improvement with Pentagon Baffle for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(10): 1862-1875.
[12]	Yaxiong Wang,Keke Wang,Shunbin Zhong,Hongwen He,Xuechao Wang. Research Progress on Durability Enhancement-oriented Electric Control Technology of Automotive Fuel Cell System [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 545-559.
[13]	Xudong Liu,Xuezhe Tao Jianjian Wei. Analysis on the Key Influencing Factors of Distributed Current Measurement in PEMFC [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 1152-1160.
[14]	Yingjie Liu,Ben Chen. Research Progress in Mass Transfer Enhancement of Flow Field in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(6): 799-807.
[15]	Dai Wentong, Li Qiliang, Li Zhuoming, Chang Yifei, Yang Zhigang. Investigation into Bonnet Aerodynamic Characteristics of Follower Vehicle in Two-vehicle Platoon at Different Reynolds Numbers [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 593-599.