汽车工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 2047-2057.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2023.11.006
所属专题: 新能源汽车技术-电驱动&能量管理2023年
收稿日期:
2023-07-06
修回日期:
2023-08-29
出版日期:
2023-11-25
发布日期:
2023-11-27
通讯作者:
马菁
E-mail:jingma@chd.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2023-07-06
Revised:
2023-08-29
Online:
2023-11-25
Published:
2023-11-27
Contact:
Jing Ma
E-mail:jingma@chd.edu.cn
摘要:
为满足锂电池成包后的温度一致性需求,本文提出一种基于热管与液冷板的复合冷却结构。利用数值模拟对液冷板内两种不同流道(流道I和流道II)的冷却性能进行对比,结果表明流道II的冷却性能更优;采用正交试验法筛选出4个对流道II冷却性能影响较大的结构因素作为设计变量,以电池组温差和冷却液压降为目标函数,建立设计变量与目标函数之间的Kriging代理模型并采用NSGA-II遗传算法进行寻优。与初始结构相比,优化后的流道II对应的电池组温差和冷却液压降分别降低了10.52%和50.14%,而电池组最高温度仅升高了0.68%。本文的方法和结论可为热管式锂电池冷却结构的设计与优化提供借鉴。
段志勇,马菁. 锂电池热管-液冷板式冷却结构多目标优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2047-2057.
Zhiyong Duan,Jing Ma. Multi-objective Optimization of Lithium Battery Composite Cooling Structure Based on Heat Pipes and Liquid Cooling Plate[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 2047-2057.
表4
正交试验方案及结果"
试验编号 | 试验因素 | 试验指标 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | Tmax/℃ | ?T/℃ | ?p/Pa | |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 36.57 | 4.33 | 6 543.05 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 36.48 | 4.51 | 6 998.52 |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 36.48 | 4.70 | 7 345.48 |
4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 36.54 | 4.40 | 2 166.20 |
5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 36.47 | 4.54 | 2 291.40 |
6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 36.42 | 4.66 | 2 417.41 |
7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 36.69 | 4.20 | 1 096.05 |
8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 36.60 | 4.38 | 1 191.02 |
9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 36.53 | 4.51 | 1 269.84 |
10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 36.71 | 4.06 | 2 107.86 |
11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 36.68 | 4.13 | 2 233.74 |
12 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 36.61 | 4.26 | 2 382.12 |
13 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 36.76 | 3.98 | 643.32 |
14 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 36.71 | 4.10 | 670.19 |
15 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 36.64 | 4.21 | 738.21 |
16 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 36.67 | 4.15 | 323.16 |
17 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 36.59 | 4.31 | 347.04 |
18 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 36.52 | 4.45 | 384.61 |
19 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 36.85 | 3.80 | 1 135.38 |
20 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 36.81 | 3.87 | 1 214.99 |
21 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 36.74 | 3.97 | 1 279.81 |
22 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 36.77 | 3.94 | 293.24 |
23 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 36.71 | 4.05 | 318.12 |
24 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 36.63 | 4.18 | 337.54 |
25 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 36.75 | 3.99 | 157.51 |
26 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 36.68 | 4.11 | 173.82 |
27 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 36.62 | 4.24 | 183.92 |
表5
?T 和 ?p极差分析表"
因素 | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
?T | ki1 | 4.469 | 4.093 | 4.291 | 4.226 | 4.188 | 4.208 |
ki2 | 4.183 | 4.221 | 4.265 | 4.216 | 4.231 | 4.222 | |
ki3 | 4.015 | 4.353 | 4.111 | 4.179 | 4.241 | 4.237 | |
Ri | 0.454 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.082 | 0.053 | 0.029 | |
?p | ki1 | 3 479.9 | 569.7 | 2 543.4 | 1 247.7 | 1 607.3 | 1 668.6 |
ki2 | 1 092.2 | 3 471.2 | 1 568.2 | 2 606.0 | 1 715.4 | 1 706.3 | |
ki3 | 566 | 1 097.3 | 1 026.5 | 1 284.4 | 1 815.4 | 1 763.3 | |
Ri | 2 913.8 | 2 901.6 | 1 516.9 | 1 358.3 | 208.1 | 94.7 |
表6
样本点和数值模拟结果"
样本 序号 | 设计变量/mm | 目标函数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ?T/℃ | ?p /Pa | |
1 | 3.2 | 4.6 | -1.75 | 1.5 | 4.00 | 1 577.11 |
2 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 17.5 | 1.8 | 4.08 | 337.97 |
3 | 2.8 | 10 | -33.25 | 1.2 | 4.23 | 624.13 |
4 | 3.5 | 6 | 35 | 9 | 3.79 | 725.85 |
5 | 4.4 | 11.6 | 3.5 | 8.4 | 4.21 | 170.46 |
6 | 2.1 | 9.2 | 33.25 | 8.1 | 4.17 | 1 444.79 |
7 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 8.75 | 7.5 | 3.98 | 3 272.74 |
8 | 4.2 | 8 | -5.25 | 6.6 | 4.23 | 3 636.63 |
9 | 2 | 6.6 | 15.75 | 11.7 | 4.26 | 2 755.57 |
10 | 3.7 | 8.4 | -7 | 0.6 | 4.23 | 442.08 |
11 | 4.7 | 11 | 7 | 2.7 | 4.19 | 166.50 |
12 | 4.6 | 10.2 | -26.25 | 3.9 | 4.19 | 196.32 |
13 | 2.7 | 12 | 21 | 4.5 | 4.23 | 522.04 |
14 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 14 | 6 | 4.05 | 930.90 |
15 | 1.7 | 4.8 | -19.25 | 4.8 | 4.35 | 6 671.46 |
16 | 2.2 | 11.8 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 4.39 | 924.27 |
17 | 1.8 | 10.8 | -3.5 | 0.9 | 4.48 | 1 791.17 |
18 | 4.3 | 6.8 | -29.75 | 10.5 | 4.16 | 441.83 |
19 | 1.3 | 5.8 | 31.5 | 6.9 | 4.16 | 8 178.04 |
20 | 2.9 | 8.6 | -8.75 | 11.1 | 4.17 | 688.61 |
21 | 4.9 | 5.6 | -14 | 3 | 4.14 | 508.92 |
22 | 1.9 | 7 | -15.75 | 0 | 4.4 | 3 085.39 |
23 | 2.4 | 7.8 | 0 | 5.1 | 4.26 | 1 398.59 |
24 | 1.2 | 9 | -24.5 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 6 178.49 |
25 | 4 | 9.4 | 29.75 | 5.7 | 4.06 | 296.50 |
26 | 3 | 11.4 | -12.25 | 5.4 | 4.26 | 421.75 |
27 | 1.6 | 11.2 | -22.75 | 9.3 | 4.44 | 1 756.09 |
28 | 5 | 7.6 | 19.25 | 9.6 | 4.06 | 260.97 |
29 | 3.8 | 4 | -17.5 | 7.2 | 4.16 | 1 538.45 |
30 | 3.6 | 9.8 | 22.75 | 12 | 4.03 | 316.24 |
31 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 28 | 3.6 | 3.87 | 966.01 |
32 | 2.6 | 8.2 | -35 | 7.8 | 4.15 | 962.95 |
33 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 1.75 | 11.4 | 4.18 | 823.29 |
34 | 1.4 | 5.2 | 12.25 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 804.44 |
35 | 2.3 | 5 | -21 | 10.8 | 4.15 | 2 981.50 |
36 | 1.5 | 8.8 | 26.25 | 2.4 | 4.16 | 2 873.72 |
37 | 1.1 | 7.4 | -10.5 | 8.7 | 4.46 | 1 055.29 |
38 | 1 | 10.4 | 5.25 | 6.3 | 4.63 | 9 370.14 |
39 | 3.4 | 6.4 | -31.5 | 3.3 | 3.99 | 723.48 |
40 | 4.1 | 10.6 | -28 | 9.9 | 4.19 | 225.82 |
41 | 3.3 | 9.6 | 24.5 | 0.3 | 4.07 | 426.63 |
1 | 曾祥兵, 谢堃, 张伟, 等. 新型动力电池热管理系统设计及性能研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(4): 476-481. |
ZENG X B,XIE K,ZHANG W, et al. Design and performance study of a new type of thermal management system for traction battery[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 476-481. | |
2 | 戴海燕, 王玉兴. 基于电化学热耦合模型的电动汽车电池模组热特性研究[J].汽车工程,2020,42(5):665-671,687. |
DAI H Y, WANG Y X. Study on thermal characteristics of battery modules of electric vehicle based on electrochemical thermal coupling model[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020,42(5):665-671,687. | |
3 | LIN J Y, LIU X H, LI S, et al. A review on recent progress, challenges and perspective of battery thermal management system[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 167: 120834. |
4 | ZHOU H B, ZHOU F, ZHANG Q, et al. Thermal management of cylindrical lithium-ion battery based on a liquid cooling method with half-helical duct[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 162: 114257. |
5 | ABDELKAREEM M A, MAGHRABIE H M, ABOKHALIL A G, et al. Thermal management systems based on heat pipes for batteries in EVs/HEVs[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104384. |
6 | LUO J, ZOU D, WANG Y S, et al. Battery thermal management systems (BTMs) based on phase change material (PCM): a comprehensive review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 430: 132741. |
7 | 丹聃, 姚程宁, 张扬军, 等. 基于热管技术的动力电池热管理系统研究现状及展望[J]. 科学通报, 2019, 64(7): 682-693. |
DAN D, YAO C N, ZHANG Y J, et al. Research progress and future prospects of battery thermal management system based on heat pipe technology[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(7): 682-693. | |
8 | ABDELKAREEM M A, MAGHRABIE H M, KHALIL A G, et al. Thermal management systems based on heat pipes for batteries in EVs/HEVs [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104384. |
9 | YUE Q L, HE C X, JIANG H R, et al. A hybrid battery thermal management system for electric vehicles under dynamic working conditions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 164: 10. |
10 | HE L F, TANG X W, LUO Q L, et al. Structure optimization of a heat pipe-cooling battery thermal management system based on fuzzy grey relational analysis[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 182: 14. |
11 | JANG D S, YUN S, HONG S H, et al. Performance characteristics of a novel heat pipe-assisted liquid cooling system for the thermal management of lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 251: 115001. |
12 | CHAVAN U, PRAJAPATI O, HUJARE P. Lithium-ion battery thermal management by using coupled heat pipe and liquid cold plate[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 80: 382-388. |
13 | WANG J Q, GAN Y H, LIANG J L, et al. Sensitivity analysis of factors influencing a heat pipe-based thermal management system for a battery module with cylindrical cells[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 151: 475-485. |
14 | HUANG H F, WANG H, GU J Q, et al. High-dimensional model representation-based global sensitivity analysis and the design of a novel thermal management system for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 190: 54-72. |
15 | 刘显茜, 孙安梁, 田川. 基于仿生翅脉流道冷板的锂离子电池组液冷散热[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2266-2273. |
LIU X X, SUN A L, TIAN C. Research on liquid cooling and heat dissipation of lithium-ion battery pack based on bionic wings vein channel cold plate[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2266-2273. | |
16 | BERNARDI D, PAWLIKOWSKI E, NEWMAN J. A general energy balance for battery systems[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1985, 132(1): 5-12. |
17 | 马菁,段志勇,孙勇飞,等.基于热管的储能锂电池散热特性数值模拟研究[J/OL].中国电机工程学报: 1-8[2023-04-12]. |
MA J, DUAN Z Y, SUN Y F, et al. Numerical simulation on the heat dissipation characteristics of lithium battery for energy storage based on heat pipe[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE: 1-8[2023-04-12]. | |
18 | LAI Y X, WU W X, CHEN K, et al. A compact and lightweight liquid-cooled thermal management solution for cylindrical lithium-ion power battery pack [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 144: 12. |
19 | DENG T, RAN Y, YIN Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization design of double-layered reverting cooling plate for lithium-ion batteries[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 143: 118580. |
20 | YANG Z, YIN Z Q, WANG D H, et al. Effects of ternary sintering aids and sintering parameters on properties of alumina ceramics based on orthogonal test method[J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 241: 122453. |
21 | DENG C Y, MIAO J G, WEI B, et al. Evaluation of machine tools with position-dependent milling stability based on Kriging model[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2018, 124: 33-42. |
22 | JI N, ZHANG W X, YU Y Y, et al. Multi-Objective optimization of injection molding based on optimal latin hypercube sampling method and NSGA-II algorithm[J]. Engineering Plastics Application, 2020,48(3):72-77. |
23 | BAGHERZADEH S A, D’ORAZIO A, KARIMIPOUR A, et al. A novel sensitivity analysis model of EANN for F-MWCNTs-Fe3O4/EG nanofluid thermal conductivity: Outputs predicted analytically instead of numerically to more accuracy and less costs [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 521: 406-415. |
[1] | 熊萌,张栋,尤国建,孙添飞,盛凯,魏学哲. 电动汽车无线充电高效高利用率磁芯的多目标优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(9): 1740-1752. |
[2] | 郭文超,杨林,邓忠伟,李济霖,范志先. 云端数据驱动的锂电池故障分级预警研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(9): 1677-1687. |
[3] | 邹渊,孙文景,张旭东,温雅,曹万科,张兆龙. 面向时间敏感网络的车载以太网网络架构多目标优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(5): 746-758. |
[4] | 李贵敬,谷青锴,杨昊鑫,黄健齐,邸立明. PA/EG耦合风冷电池热管理系统轻量研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(2): 209-218. |
[5] | 朱仲文,汪鑫,江维海,李丞. 氢燃料电池汽车整车集成式热管理系统研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 1991-2000. |
[6] | 于天蝉,王源,石文星,梁辰吉昱,李先庭,岑俊平,罗敏. 基于三介质换热器的电动汽车热管理系统及其性能分析[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2001-2013. |
[7] | 路兴隆,张甫仁,赵海波,孙世政,李雪,赵浩东. 基于同心圆结构的新型液冷板优化设计及其性能研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2058-2069. |
[8] | 李捷,吴晓东,许敏,刘永刚. 基于强化学习的城市场景多目标生态驾驶策略[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(10): 1791-1802. |
[9] | 张英朝,简杰松,张锦涛,王国华,于远彬. 基于三维/一维强耦合模型的整车热平衡与热系统参数对性能影响的研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(6): 936-944. |
[10] | 马彦,李佳怡,马乾,陈明超. 基于迭代动态规划的动力电池组热管理优化策略[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(5): 709-721. |
[11] | 陈光,魏晨阳,李晓宇,景国玺. 基于梁单元简化模型的锂电池组碰撞安全临界条件的判定[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(5): 722-729. |
[12] | 吴晓刚,齐明山,杜玖玉,Shchurov N. I.,Shtang A. A.. 不同充电倍率下锂离子电池组冷却系统结构设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(4): 482-494. |
[13] | 周兴凯,窦祖芳,杨喜娟,杨乔礼. 基于IEEE 802.11p的自适应主次窗口退避机制及验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(12): 1856-1865. |
[14] | 刘细平,伏结盛,杜隆鑫,郭高胜,朱文健. 电动汽车用双层永磁体IPMSM解析与优化设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(8): 1128-1135. |
[15] | 鲁若宇,胡杰,陈瑞楠,徐文才,曹恺. 基于DMPC的智能汽车协同式自适应巡航控制[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(8): 1177-1186. |
|