电动汽车热泵PTC耦合制热策略研究

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2022.10.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为减少电动汽车制热能耗，基于热泵系统制热性能试验，提出热泵系统制热在-20~5 ℃环境温度范围内均存在制热性能分区，制定了PTC在制热低效区提前介入的热泵PTC耦合制热策略，利用AMESim搭建的系统模型进行仿真并与传统策略进行了对比研究。与采用6 000 r/min转速热泵辅助278.95 W PTC制热功率相比，采用转速4 700 r/min热泵辅助462.11 W PTC制热综合能耗低6.4%，二者均能使车内温度稳定在24 ℃。相比于单一热泵制热，采用PTC提前介入的热泵PTC耦合制热策略具有加热快、能耗低、转速低等优势，-10 ℃环境温度下车内目标温度为20 ℃时，调节过程中能耗最多降低9.4%，稳定后降低2.8%。采用PTC提前介入策略时压缩机转速应尽可能接近高效区临界转速，此策略在不改变系统结构的基础上可明显提升制热效率和舒适性。

关键词: 电动汽车, R134a热泵, PTC, 加热策略, 动态调节

Abstract:

In order to decrease the power consumption for EV heating， it is proposed that there are heating performance zones for heat pump system heating within the ambient temperature range of -20 to 5℃ based on the heating performance test of the heat pump system. The PTC coupling heating strategy of the heat pump with PTC involving in the low efficiency zone in advance is developed. The system model built by AMESim is used for simulation and the comparison study is conducted with the traditional strategy. Compared with the heat pump with 6 000 r/min rotary speed coupling 278.95 W PTC heating power， the heat pump with 4 700 r/min rotary speed coupling 462.11 W PTC heating power consumes 6.4% less energy to maintain the car temperature at 24 ℃。Compared with single heat pump heating， the heat pump coupling PTC heating strategy with PTC intervention in advance has the advantages of faster heating， lower energy consumption and lower rotary speed. When the ambient temperature is -10 ℃ and the target temperature in the vehicle is 20 ℃，the energy consumption in the regulation process can be reduced by 9.4% at most and by 2.8% after stabilization. When the strategy with PTC intervention in advance is adopted， the compressor speed should be maintained as close to the critical speed in the high efficiency zone as possible. The strategy can significantly improve the heating efficiency and comfort without changing the system structure.

Key words: electrical vehicle, R134a heat pump, PTC, heating strategy, dynamic regulation

季宏增,蔡景羊,裴金晨,何星磊,郭汾,王义春. 电动汽车热泵PTC耦合制热策略研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(10): 1563-1570.

Hongzeng Ji,Jingyang Cai,Jinchen Pei,Xinglei He,Fen Guo,Yichun Wang. Research on Heat Pump PTC Coupling Heating Strategy for Electric Vehicle[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(10): 1563-1570.

图/表 18

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

图18

参考文献 12

1	LEE J T， KWON S， LIM Y S， et al. Effect of air-conditioning on driving range of electric vehicle for various driving modes［C］. SAE Paper 2013-01-0040.
2	KONDO T， KATAYAMA A， SUETAKE H， et al. Development of automotive air-conditioning systems by heat pump technology［J］. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review，2011，48（2）：27-32.
3	HOSOZ M， DIREK M. Performance evaluation of an integrated automotive air conditioning and heat pump system［J］. Energy Conversion and Management，2006，47（5）：545-559.
4	QIN F， XVE Q， GIOVANNY M A V， et al. Experimental investigation on heating performance of heat pump for electric vehicles at -20°C ambient temperature［J］. Energy Conversion and Management，2015，102： 39-49.
5	ANTONIJEVIC D， HECKT R. Heat pump supplemental heating system for motor vehicles［J］. Automobile Engineering，2004，218（10）： 1111-1115.
6	KIM K Y， KIM S C， KIM M S. Experimental studies on the heating performance of the PTC heater and heat pump combined system in fuel cells and electric vehicles［J］. International Journal of Automotive Technology， 2012，13：971-977.
7	ZHANG G， ZOU H， QIN F， et al. Investigation on an improved heat pump AC system with the view of return air utilization and anti-fogging for electric vehicles［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering，2017，115： 726-735.
8	王雅纯，牟连嵩，郑清平，等.电动汽车组合式采暖系统的低温试验研究［J］.汽车实用技术，2018（20）：3-6.
	WANG Y C， MOU L S， ZHENG Q P， et al. Study on low temperature test of combined heating system for electric vehicle［J］. Automobile Applied Technology， 2018（20）：3-6.
9	周英杰，刘向农，吴涛，等.电动汽车冬季热负荷及制热调节特性研究［J］.低温与超导，2020，48（8）：90-95，106.
	ZHOU Y J， LIU X N， WU T， et al. Study on winter load and heating regulation characteristics of electric vehicles［J］. Cryogenics & Superconductivity， 2020，48（8）： 90-95，106.
10	SHAH M M. A general correlation for heat transfer during film condensation inside pipes［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer，1979，22： 547-556.
11	STEINER D， TABOREK J. Flow boiling heat transfer in vertical tubes correlated by an asymptotic model［J］. Heat Transfer Engineering，1992，13： 322-329.
12	INCROPERA F P， DEWITT D P， BERGMAN T L， et al. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer， 6th edition［M］. John Wiley & Sons， Inc. 2007.

[1]	张念忠,宋强,王冠峰,王明生. 车用永磁同步电机无电流传感器控制研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(2): 281-289.
[2]	焦志鹏, 马建, 赵轩, 张凯, 孟德安, 韩琪, 张昭. 基于电动汽车制动安全检测的短时工况及方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 109-119.
[3]	原江鑫, 何莉萍, 李耀东, 李罡. 电动汽车BMS从控板热分析及散热优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 128-138.
[4]	张鹏博, 陈仁祥, 邵毅明, 孙世政, 闫凯波. 纯电动汽车电驱动系统故障诊断研究进展[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 61-74.
[5]	贺伊琳,马建,杨舒凯,郑威,薛启帆. 融合预瞄特性的智能电动汽车稳定性模型预测控制研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(5): 719-734.
[6]	梁海强,何洪文,代康伟,庞博,王鹏. 融合经验老化模型和机理模型的电动汽车锂离子电池寿命预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(5): 825-835.
[7]	吴忠强,张长兴. 考虑配电网负荷的电动汽车分布式充电控制[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(4): 598-608.
[8]	吴志恒,刘爱民. 汽车永磁同步电机切换函数式混合控制策略[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(4): 619-627.
[9]	王军年,高守林,杨钫,管畅洋,杨志华. 多行星排转矩定向分配电驱动桥振动特性优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(3): 421-429.
[10]	朱成,刘頔,滕欣余,张国华,于丹,刘沙,胡苧丹. 新能源汽车综合经济性对比分析及预测研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(2): 333-340.
[11]	李琴,汤建明,张博远,陈勇,王勇. 分布式驱动电动汽车多执行器容错控制研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(12): 2251-2259.
[12]	于天蝉,王源,石文星,梁辰吉昱,李先庭,岑俊平,罗敏. 基于三介质换热器的电动汽车热管理系统及其性能分析[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2001-2013.
[13]	薛撬,李军求,肖焱升,赵宇,刘宇,韩冬雪. 低温环境下车用锂电池预加热策略研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2014-2022.
[14]	宋强,王冠峰,商赫,张念忠. 基于多参数控制的分布式驱动电动汽车操纵稳定性控制策略研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2104-2112.
[15]	洪吉超,梁峰伟,杨海旭,李克瑞. 大数据驱动动力电池智能安全管理与控制方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(10): 1845-1861.