基于多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络的跨域目标检测算法

doi:10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2022.09.004

汽车工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1327-1338.doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2022.09.004

所属专题：智能网联汽车技术专题-感知&HMI&测评2022年

基于多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络的跨域目标检测算法

胡杰^1,^2,³(),徐博远^1,^2,³,熊宗权^1,^2,³,昌敏杰^1,^2,³,郭迪^1,^2,³,谢礼浩^1,^2,³

^1.武汉理工大学，现代汽车零部件技术湖北省重点实验室，武汉　430070
^2.武汉理工大学，汽车零部件技术湖北省协同创新中心，武汉　430070
^3.武汉理工大学，湖北省新能源与智能网联车工程技术研究中心，武汉　430070

收稿日期:2022-03-22 修回日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-09-21
通讯作者: 胡杰 E-mail:auto_hj@163.com
基金资助:
湖北省科技重大专项(2020AA001)

Cross-Domain Object Detection Algorithm Based on Multi-scale Mask Classification Domain Adaptive Network

Jie Hu^1,^2,³(),Boyuan Xu^1,^2,³,Zongquan Xiong^1,^2,³,Minjie Chang^1,^2,³,Di Guo^1,^2,³,Lihao Xie^1,^2,³

^1.Wuhan University of Technology，Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components，Wuhan 　430070
^2.Wuhan University of Technology，Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology，Wuhan 　430070
^3.Wuhan University of Technology，Hubei Research Center for New Energy&Intelligent Connected Vehicle，Wuhan 　430070

Received:2022-03-22 Revised:2022-04-28 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-09-21
Contact: Jie Hu E-mail:auto_hj@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对无监督域自适应目标检测中，域的可辨性和不变性之间的矛盾导致域负迁移和多尺度问题，本文中提出了一种可缓解域负迁移的多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络。首先在主干网络上对多个中间层进行图像级域对抗训练。接着在图像级特征图上加入区域提议掩码，作为一种补充信息对实例特征进行补充。最后提出分类别实例级域分类器，在保证域可辨性前提下，使网络尽可能地提取出有效的域不变信息。在Cityscapes和FoggyCityscapes两个数据集上进行验证的结果表明，本文提出的多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络，其域分类平均精度的平均值提高了13.2个百分点，说明网络域自适应能力显著提升。

关键词: 目标检测, 域自适应网络, 深度学习, 对抗学习

Abstract:

Aiming at the problems of multi-scale and domain negative transfer caused by the contradiction between domain discriminability and invariance in unsupervised domain adaptive object detection， a multi-scale mask classification domain adaptive network （MMCN）， that can alleviate the negative transfer of domain， is proposed in this paper. Firstly the adversarial training of image-level domain is performed on multiple intermediate layers on backbone network. Then a region proposal mask is added to the image-level feature map as a supplementary information to supplement instance features. Finally a sub-category instance-level domain classifier is put forward to enable the network to extract effective domain-invariant information as much as possible on the premise of ensuring domain discriminability. The results of verification on both Cityscapes and FoggyCityscapes datasets show that the mean average precision of domain classification with MMCN proposed is 13.2 percentage points higher than that with DA-FasterRCNN， significantly enhancing the domain adaptive capability of network.

Key words: object detection, domain adaptive network, deep learning, adversarial learning

胡杰,徐博远,熊宗权,昌敏杰,郭迪,谢礼浩. 基于多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络的跨域目标检测算法[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(9): 1327-1338.

Jie Hu,Boyuan Xu,Zongquan Xiong,Minjie Chang,Di Guo,Lihao Xie. Cross-Domain Object Detection Algorithm Based on Multi-scale Mask Classification Domain Adaptive Network[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(9): 1327-1338.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

表2

表3

表4

区域提议掩码位置消融实验"

方法	$L 1$	$L 2$	$L 3$	人	骑手	汽车	货车	公交车	火车	摩托车	自行车	mAP/%
	$√$			35.4	45.0	51.2	31.8	45.6	36.8	32.9	38.0	39.6
MMCN			$√$	34.2	45.3	51.4	24.4	48.2	31.2	37.5	37.4	38.7
	$√$		$√$	33.7	46.6	51.6	29.1	43.4	39.8	30.5	38.5	39.2
	$√$	$√$	$√$	25.7	42.5	35.9	18.5	28.3	18.0	23.3	22.1	26.8
	$√$	$√$		33.4	45.3	51.2	29.6	44.6	33.5	28.9	34.7	37.7
		$√$	$√$	34.7	47.6	51.2	28.1	48.2	35.2	33.1	36.8	39.4
		$√$		33.3	45.8	51.2	32.1	47.3	38.0	33.8	37.3	39.9

表4

表5

各模块消融实验"

多尺度	区域提议掩码+补充信息	实例分类域对齐	mAP/%
$×$	$×$	$×$	31.7
$×$	$×$	$√$	34.7
$√$	$×$	$×$	36.5
$√$	$√$	$×$	39.9
$√$	$×$	$√$	39.3
$√$	$√$	$√$	40.8

表5

图7

表6

图8

图9

参考文献 32

1	REDMON J， FARHADI A. Yolov3： An incremental improveme-nt［J］.arXiv preprint arXiv：，2018.
2	REN S， HE K， GIRSHICK R， et al. Faster r-cnn： towards re-al-time object detection with region proposal networks［J］.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems，2015，28.
3	邱锡鹏.《神经网络与深度学习》［J］.中文信息学报， 2020（7）：1.
4	GANIN Y，USTINOVA E，AJAKAN H，et al.Domain-adversarial training of neural networks［J］.Journal of Machine Learning Research， 2016，17（59）：1-35.
5	LONG M，ZHU H，WANG J，et al.Unsupervised domain adaptati-on with residual transfer networks［C］. Proc. of the Neural Information Processing Systems，2016.
6	TZENG E，HOFFMAN J，SAENKO K，et al.Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation［C］. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2017.
7	TZENG E，HOFFMAN J，ZHANG N，et al.Deep domain confusion： maximizing for domain invariance［EB/OL］.arXiv：1412.3474，2014.1，2.
8	SAITO K，USHIKU Y，HARADA T，et al.Adversarial dropout regularization.［C］. Proc. of the International Conference and Learning Representations，2018.
9	LIU M Y，BREUEL T，KAUTZ J.Unsupervised image-to-image translation networks. ［C］. Proc. of the Neural Information Processing Systems，2017.
10	HOFFMAN J，TZENG E，PARK T，et al.Cycada： cycle-consistent adversarial domain adaptation［C］.Proc. of the International Conference and Machine Learning，2018.1.
11	CHEN C Q，XIE W P，HUANG W B，et al.Progressive feature alignment for unsupervised domain adaptation［C］. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2019：627–636.
12	GANIN Y，LEMPITSKY V.Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation［C］.Proc. of the International Conference and Machine Learning，2015：1180–1189.
13	LONG M S，CAO Z J，WANG J M，et al.Conditional adversarial domain adaptation［C］.Proc. of the Neural Information Processing Systems，2018：1640–1650.
14	SHU R，HUNG H B，NARUI H，et al. A dirt approach to unsup-ervised domain adaptation［C］.Proc. of the International Conference and Learning Rrepresentations，2018.
15	TZENG E，HOFFMAN J，SAENKO K，et al.Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation［C］. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2017.
16	XIE S A，ZHENG Z B，CHEN L，et al.Learning semantic represe-ntations for unsupervised domain adaptation［C］.Proc. of the International Conference and Machine Learning，2018：627–636.
17	BEN-DAVID S，BLITZER J，CRAMMER K，et al.A theory of learning from different domains［J］.Machine Learning， 2010，79（1-2）：151-175.
18	BEN-DAVID S，BLITZER J，CRAMMER K，et al.Analysis of representations for domain adaptation［C］.Proc. of the Neural Inf-ormation Processing Systems，2007.1，2.
19	CHEN Y，LI W，SAKARIDIS C，et al. Domain adaptive Faster R-CNN for object detection in the wild［C］.Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2018：3339-3348.
20	ZHU X，PANG J，YANG C，et al，Adapting object detectors via selective cross-domain alignment［C］.Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2019：687-696.
21	LI Y J， DAI X， MA C Y， et al. Cross-domain object detection via adaptive selftraining［J］. arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2021.
22	FUJII K， KERA H， KAWAMOTO K. Adversarially trained object detector for unsupervised domain adaptation［J］. arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2021.
23	ZHUANG C， HAN X， HUANG W， et al. iFAN： image-instance full alignment networks for adaptive object detection［C］.Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2020， 34（7）： 13122-13129.
24	REDKO I， MORVANT E， HABRARD A， et al. A survey on domain adaptation theory［J］. arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2020.
25	SIMONYAN K，ZISSERMAN A.Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.［C］.Proc. of the Intern-ational Conference and Learning Rrepresentations，2015.
26	SAITO K，USHIKU Y，HARADA T，et al，Strong-weak distribution alignment for adaptive object detection［C］. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2019：6956-6965.
27	LIN T Y，GOYAL P，GIRSHICK R，et al.Focal loss for dense obj-ect detection ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence，2017，PP（99）：2999-3007.
28	ZHANG H，TIAN Y，WANG K，et al，Synthetic-to-real domain adaptation for object instance segmentation［C］. Proc. of the 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Netwo-rks，2019：1-7.
29	KIM T，JEONG M，KIM S，et al.Diversify andmatch： a domain adaptive representation learning paradigm for object detection［C］.Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition，2019：12456–12465.
30	HE Z，ZHANG L.Domain adaptive object detection via asymmetric tri-way Faster-RCNN［C］. ECCV 2020： 309–324.
31	WU A， LIU R， HAN Y， et al. Vector-decomposed disentanglement for domain-invariant object detection［C］ .Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2021： 9342-9351.
32	CHEN H Y， WANG P H， LIU C H， et al. Complement objective training［J］. arXiv preprint arXiv：， 2019.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

625

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	12	0	0	613

From	Others	local

Times	119	506
Rate	19%	81%

Abstract

251

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	251

From	Others	local

Times	250	1
Rate	100%	0%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

方法	人	骑手	汽车	货车	公交车	火车	摩托车	自行车	mAP/%
Faster R-CNN	24.1	33.1	34.3	4.1	22.3	3.0	15.3	26.5	20.3
DA-Faster［19］	25.0	31.0	40.5	22.1	35.3	20.2	20.0	27.1	27.6
StrongWeak［26］	29.9	42.3	43.5	24.5	36.2	32.6	30.0	35.3	34.3
DD-MRL［29］	30.8	40.5	44.3	27.2	38.4	34.5	28.4	32.2	34.6
ATF［30］	34.6	47.0	50.0	23.7	43.3	38.7	33.4	38.8	38.7
VDD［31］	33.4	44.0	51.7	33.9	52.0	34.7	34.2	36.8	40.0
MMCN（本文）	33.4	46.8	51.9	29.1	48.4	43.2	36.0	37.4	40.8

方法	权重	人	骑手	汽车	货车	公交车	火车	摩托车	自行车	mAP/%
MMCN	0.1	33.5	44.6	50.9	28.0	44.5	38.3	34.3	35.1	38.6
	0.2	33.4	47.1	50.9	30.1	44.9	35.6	31.9	36.1	38.8
	0.3	26.3	41.5	32.4	21.9	32.4	9.4	28.3	23.4	28.4
	0.4	33.4	46.1	50.1	26.1	41.7	23.0	32.6	32.5	35.7
	0.5	33.5	45.2	50.5	33.4	43.6	40.8	30.9	36.4	39.3
	0.6	26.0	43.1	43.8	20.2	34.3	14.6	23.4	22.6	28.5
	0.7	32.9	46.5	50.3	29.7	45.2	36.7	29.2	35.4	38.2
	0.8	33.4	46.2	50.9	27.3	46.8	34.8	33.0	35.3	38.5
	0.9	33.6	46.3	50.7	29.8	46.2	31.6	33.3	37.4	38.6

方法	中间层1	中间层2	人	骑手	汽车	货车	公交车	火车	摩托车	自行车	mAP/%
MMCN	7	9	33.7	46.0	50.9	28.2	46.6	36.4	34.6	36.3	39.1
	5	9	33.5	46.7	50.7	26.8	43.9	24.0	32.9	36.2	36.8
	7	8	33.1	45.4	50.9	25.3	45.7	19.7	35.0	36.8	36.5
	6	8	33.3	47.0	51.3	30.2	46.3	23.9	29.2	36.5	37.2
	5	8	33.4	45.0	51.0	31.1	45.5	22.9	35.5	36.4	37.6
	7	10	33.3	46.6	51.1	29.4	44.8	35.0	34.0	36.0	38.8
	6	10	33.3	44.7	51.0	30.0	44.4	37.3	33.4	35.8	38.7
	5	10	32.9	44.6	48.6	23.4	39.2	25.8	30.1	32.4	34.6
	6	9	33.4	46.8	51.9	29.1	48.4	43.2	36.0	37.4	40.8

[1]	程腾,倪昊,张强,王文冲,石琴. 基于虚拟点云的二阶段多模态融合网络[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(2): 222-229.
[2]	高泽, 楚遵康, 石稼晟, 林滏, 饶卫雄, 余海燕. 基于图网络的汽车零部件应力场快速预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 170-178.
[3]	马雷, 杨顺清, 王欢欢, 翟家琛, 徐健傲. 融合图像显著性特征的轻量级目标检测算法[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(1): 84-91.
[4]	刘卫国,项志宇,刘锐,李国栋,王子旭. 基于深度学习的端到端车辆运动规划方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(8): 1343-1352.
[5]	赵东宇, 赵树恩. 基于级联YOLOv7的自动驾驶三维目标检测[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(7): 1112-1122.
[6]	韩勇,林旭洁,黄红武,蔡鸿瑜,罗金镕,李燕婷. 典型汽车碰撞事故场景中行人运动轨迹预测方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(6): 1022-1030.
[7]	赵嘉豪,齐志权,齐智峰,王皓,何磊. 基于轮胎特征点的并行大型车辆朝向角计算[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(6): 1031-1039.
[8]	陈妍妍,王海,蔡英凤,陈龙,李祎承. 基于检测的高效自动驾驶实例分割方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(4): 541-550.
[9]	兰凤崇,陈继开,陈吉清,蒋心平,李子涵,潘威. 实车数据驱动的锂电池剩余使用寿命预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(2): 175-182.
[10]	李琳辉,张鑫亮,付一帆,连静,马家旭. 基于TC-YOLOv7算法的可见光与红外后融合检测研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(12): 2280-2290.
[11]	刘正发,吴亚,刘佩根,顾荣琦,陈广. 基于特征和标签联合分布匹配的智能驾驶跨域自适应目标检测[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(11): 2082-2091.
[12]	张小俊,奚敬哲,史延雷,袁安录. 面向路侧视角目标检测的轻量级YOLOv7-R算法[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(10): 1833-1844.
[13]	胡杰,李源洁,耿號,耿黄政,郭雄,易红卫. 基于深度学习的汽车故障知识图谱构建[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(1): 52-60.
[14]	金立生,贺阳,王欢欢,霍震,谢宪毅,郭柏苍. 基于自适应阈值DBSCAN的路侧点云分割算法[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(7): 987-996.
[15]	毕贵红,谢旭,蔡子龙,骆钊,陈臣鹏,赵鑫. 动态条件下基于深度学习的锂电池容量估计[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(6): 868-878.

基于多尺度掩码分类域自适应网络的跨域目标检测算法

Cross-Domain Object Detection Algorithm Based on Multi-scale Mask Classification Domain Adaptive Network

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10